Answer:
anchoring
Explanation:
In simple words, The anchoring phenomenon can be understood as the cognitive prejudice in which a single comparison source or 'anchor' influences a person's judgments. Following the setting of the anchoring number, a person 's future statements, estimations, and so on may differ from what things might have remained sans the anchor.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct answer is anchor.
Research on <u>"the fundamental attribution error" </u>suggests it is <u>"common"</u> for people to assume that dispositions are the underlying causes of most behaviors.
The fundamental attribution error is our tendency to clarify somebody's conduct in light of inward factors, for example, identity or air, and to think little of the impact that outside variables, for example, situational impacts, have on someone else's conduct. We may, for instance, clarify the way that somebody is jobless in view of his character, and point the finger at him for his predicament, when in certainty he was as of late laid off because of a lazy economy. Obviously, there are times when we're right about our suspicions, however the key attribution blunder is our inclination to clarify the conduct of others in light of character or air. This is especially obvious when the conduct is negative.
Answer:
They worked the hardest and made the least money out of all the ethnic groups, later they had government assistance and the Mexicans got more jobs. Still they were forced into debt peonage, that bounded them into slavery. worked on farms and in hot climate.
Explanation:
C. Roman emperors were often power hungry generals
Brainliest please?
<span>They inferred that the Appalachian Mountains have been eroding for millions of years.</span>
