All categories

1 year ago

What are some possible short-term savings goals and why are they important? (give examples)

Social Studies

1 answer:

PolarNik [594]1 year ago

8 0

Some possible short term goals would be to

Buy a new car.
To get a ticket concert.
Saving to buy a set of chairs.

<h3>What are short term saving goals?</h3>

These are the goals of saving that are intended to help a person meet up with certain needs that they may need to be fulfilled in no distant time.

These are important because it helps a person to plan towards fulfilling an immediate need.

Read more on short term saving goals here:

brainly.com/question/19988284

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

According to Dov Cohen and Alex Gunz (2002), ____________ are likely to describe a self-relevant event from their original point

PIT_PIT [208]

<em>Answer:</em>

<em>Canadians; Asians </em>

<em>Explanation:</em>

<em>As per the question, Canadians are likely to describe "self-relevant events" from a participant's viewpoint but Asians would describe the same from observer's viewpoint because of the fact that Canadian countries follow the individualistic culture or viewpoint whereas the Asian countries follow the collectivistic culture or viewpoint. According to the researchers, the individualistic culture people tend to think about oneself whereas collectivistic culture people tend to think about the group and society.</em>

8 0

2 years ago

Jerome is a 32-year-old single father with two elementary school-aged children. Marie is a 27-year-old married woman with no chi

dimulka [17.4K]

Answer:Even though as a single father, Jerome is more likely to have home-work conflicts than Marie, the perception that family life is unlikely to interfere with men's job commitment may still make Jerome a more attractive candidate to employers.

Explanation:Usually kids are seen as the woman's responsibility and not as man's and that is based on what society has established as norms. So it is likely that even if a man has kids may still be considered more.

7 0

2 years ago

In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged to the laws of civil society, locke invokes the notion of

marissa [1.9K]

In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged

to the laws of civil society, Locke invokes the notion of "tacit consent." Rawls, who is also a "social contract theorist," of sorts, argues that a social contract can arise only from "hypothetical consent." What is the difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawls's notion of hypothetical consent?

a) Tacit consent requires actually expressing one's consent to the terms of the contract, whereas hypothetical consent simply requires that a citizen would have given consent under certain ideal conditions.

b) One who gives tacit consent implies consent to the terms of the contract through her actions, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent offers her explicit word on the basis of her particular desires.

c) One who gives tacit consent implicitly suggests, through her actions, that she accepts the terms of the contract, whereas to say that someone hypothetically consents means that she would have consented to the terms of the contract were she asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

d) Tacit consent is consent given in the state of nature, whereas hypothetical consent occurs within an ideal society.

e) Tacit consent is consent given by any rational agent, irrespective of her particular desires or ends, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent agrees to the terms of the contract based on some particular desire that she has.

Answer:

Explanation:

The major difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawl's notion of hypothetical consent is that unlike tacit consent, someone that hypothetically consents means that the person would have likely consented to the terms of the contract if she was asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

Tacit consent involves implicitly suggesting through actions that she accepts the terms of the contract.

5 0

3 years ago

Living in the Gutpa empire was different than the Maurya empire, because although the people had a duty to obey the emperor, som

Blizzard [7]

Living in the Gutpa empire was different than the Maurya empire, because although the people had a duty to obey the emperor, some also were a kind of (CITIZEN) , with political rights and obligations.

3 0

2 years ago

Explain how the structure, powers, and functions of both houses of Congress affect the policymaking process.

34kurt

Explanation:

The structures, powers, and functions of the House of Representatives and the Senate are different, and these differences can affect the policymaking process: for example, by accelerating it or slowing it down, and by the extent to which bipartisan collaboration is or is not facilitated.

3 0

2 years ago