1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Grace [21]
2 years ago
11

Which of the following accurately describes a major difference between the Christian church in western Europe versus eastern Eur

ope in the period 500-1000?
A The western church never allowed icons while the eastern church debated the issue.
B The church in western Europe was the main source of stability and order while in the East the church was part of a robust Byzantine government.
C The western church used the language of everyday speech in services while the eastern church used Latin.
D The western church served one united political unit while the eastern church connected dozens of separate people groups.
History
1 answer:
Lostsunrise [7]2 years ago
3 0

The major difference between the Christian church in western and eastern Europe was the church in the western Europe was the main source of stability and order while in the East the church was part of a robust Byzantine government. Thus, option B is correct.

<h3>What distinguishes Eastern Europe from Western Europe?</h3>

All European nations that were formerly governed by communist governments are referred to as Eastern Europe, whereas the more economically successful and stable Western nations are referred to as Western Europe.

In contrast to priests in Western Europe, the clergy in Byzantine Christianity maintained their right to marry, which is one of the contrasts between that religion and Roman Catholicism.

Western Europe had a self-sufficient and orderly economic framework. The economy of Eastern Europe was based on trade with Asia, Africa, and other foreign nations.

Hence, the difference in the church of east and west can be drawn as western Europe church was source of stability and order, while the eastern Europe Church's was the robust Byzantine. Thus, option B is correct.

Learn more about  western and eastern Europe churches, here:

brainly.com/question/9046468

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
How did these millets help the Ottoman Empire hold their diverse empire together?
Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

In the Ottoman Empire, a millet (Turkish: [millet]) was an independent court of law pertaining to "personal law" under which a confessional community (a group abiding by the laws of Muslim Sharia, Christian Canon law, or Jewish Halakha) was allowed to rule itself under its own laws.

Despite frequently being referred to as a "system", before the nineteenth century the organization of what are now retrospectively called millets in the Ottoman Empire was not at all systematic. Rather, non-Muslims were simply given a significant degree of autonomy within their own community, without an overarching structure for the 'millet' as a whole. The notion of distinct millets corresponding to different religious communities within the empire would not emerge until the eighteenth century.[1] Subsequently, the existence of the millet system was justified through numerous foundation myths linking it back to the time of Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror (r. 1451–81),[2] although it is now understood that no such system existed in the fifteenth century.[3]

During the 19th century rise of nationalism in the Ottoman Empire, as result of the Tanzimat reforms (1839–76), the term was used for legally protected ethno-linguistic minority groups, similar to the way other countries use the word nation. The word millet comes from the Arabic word millah (ملة) and literally means "nation".[3] The millet system has been called an example of pre-modern religious pluralism.[4]

Johann Strauss, author of "A Constitution for a Multilingual Empire: Translations of the Kanun-ı Esasi and Other Official Texts into Minority Languages", wrote that the term "seems to be so essential for the understanding of the Ottoman system and especially the status of non-Muslims".

Please rate, and like, Give me Brainliest Thank you!

7 0
3 years ago
which political system is described be• This political system, based on loyalty and faithfulness, was essentially a personal set
bija089 [108]
Feudalism is the political system being described?
4 0
3 years ago
What was the sign to the Aztecs?<br><br> mountain<br> island<br> plateau<br> isthmus
KengaRu [80]

Answer:

isthmus

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the 3 goals of the Johnson reconstruction plan?
algol [13]

I would think its 1 Written a new state constitution 2 Elected a new governments 3 Repealed its act of succession

4 0
4 years ago
True or false: the main function of the Secretary of State is to determine the amount of funds that goes to each state
tekilochka [14]
Your answer would be False

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What year was earth creted on
    13·1 answer
  • The New Deal could best be summarized as a program that
    5·1 answer
  • In the period from 1200 to 1450 CE, trans-Saharan trade networks influenced state formation in West Africa.
    11·2 answers
  • If a state has six members in the House of Representatives, how many electors would it have in the electoral college
    11·1 answer
  • 1
    9·2 answers
  • Which option lists only pre-Columbian Indian groups that lived in the Southwest?
    10·2 answers
  • Did king francis ii have an illegitimate child
    6·1 answer
  • Which instrument does NOT belong in the woodwind family?
    8·2 answers
  • What did the slaves use to go into colonies?
    13·1 answer
  • 1.) How/Why do you think religions started? Explain your answer!​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!