Answer:
1. Cybercrimes are online crimes that cause loss of money some examples are: Identity fraud, Cyber bribery, Debit/credit card fr/ud, and Email fr/ud.
2. In medical offices devices linked to CT scans are able to be h/cked, there is r/nsomw/re that uses their devices. Since medic/l computers are always linked to the internet. it makes it easier for them to be h/cked. They make an employee click on an e-mail carrying m/lw/re, then the cybercrimin/ls encrypt p/tient data then dem/nd p/yment for its decryption.
3. This is a personal question but if you have ever been sc/mmed or witnessed someone being sc/mmed or almost got sc/mmed it might apply to this question
Answer:
def str_analysis(s):
if s.isdigit():
s = int(s)
if s > 99:
message = str(s) + " is a pretty big number"
else:
message = str(s) + " is a smaller number than expected"
elif s.isalpha():
message = s + " is all alphabetical characters!"
else:
message = "There are multiple character types"
return message;
s = input("enter word or integer: ")
while s != "":
print(str_analysis(s))
s = input("enter word or integer: ")
Explanation:
- Check if the string is digit, alphabetical, or mixed inside the function
- Ask the user for the input
- Call and print the result of the <em>str_analysis</em> function inside the while loop
- Keep asking for the input until the given string is empty
The Rearrangement of the words are:
- Ear map
- Rent cup
- METREON
- Sister or
- Sister Cane
<h3>What is arrangement of words?</h3>
A sorting method is known to be the orders of entries that are based on each word or phrase found in a heading, e.g. spaces, etc.
The Rearrangement of the words are:
- Ear map
- Rent cup
- METREON
- Sister or
- Sister Cane
Learn more about Arrangement from
brainly.com/question/984329
#SPJ1
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
Answer:
Thats good
Explanation:
Thanks for the points~! ;)
