I think this is true because..
technology negatively affects the environment by compromising human health and safety... endangering natural ecosystem and biodiversity... having a cumulative impact on global systems... and depleting natural resources. Technology positively affects the environment through the application of environmental science to solve problems caused by human environmental impact.
Risks to humans from environmental damage through technology include inhalation of dangerous chemicals in air pollution, contamination of water and food sources, and risk of infections and diseases through exposure to toxic wastes. Flora and fauna risk habitat loss or disruption and extinction of species through exposure to dangerous byproducts of technology. Greenhouse gases affect atmosphere and weather systems, causing global warming and chlorofluorocarbons that deplete the Earth's ozone layer. Technology consumes resources which are not necessarily renewable, including living resources, such as forests and populations of fish, and inanimate resources, such as natural chemicals and minerals.
Although technology damages the environment in many ways..it can also have the capability to limit or prevent damage using such environmental technologies such as recycling...the exploitation of renewable energy sources such as solar power and wind power... the purification of polluted air and water,and the treatment of sewage and factory wastes.. and the development and production of devices that promote energy conservation.....so this is why i think this is the answer! ☺
Hopefully this helped you!☺
A chemical bond that is formed when two atoms share electrons is called a covalent bond :)
The answer is: <span>The principal idea here is how r they obtained:
for example: sodium u put equal molar concentrations of sodium (Na) and sodium ion (Na+) together in a beaker , then dip in this solution a platinium wire (zero potential) which is connected to a normal hydrogen electrode (electrode with zero potential) then u see the reading of the whole circuit
if it is negtive, this means negative potential which means that the reducing property predominates where Na(reducing agent) is oxidized and electrons r accumulated on the platinum which gives it negative charge
This means that (Na) is a reducing agent, its strength depends on the value of the potential obtained, and here the table can help you
If u want to know if it's strong red. agent, look for it in the table, see if it has higher reduction potentail (or lower oxidation potential, same idea) than most other substances then it is reducing agent
and vice versa
So if we look at ur examples, u will find that MnO4- is the very strong oxidizing agent (has highest oxidation potential) (lowest reduction potential)
H+ and H2 are both with zero potential, no redox properties
And lastly Na and Na+:
This u can know from ur knowledge in chemistry, that sodium is very rarely found in elemental form and always in the form of ion so u can deduce that Na is the very strong reducing agent
or u can see the value of its standard oxi or red potetial and deduce which is the predominating form of them.
I hope this helps</span>
Answer:
Weak bonds require less energy to form than strong bonds
Explanation:
According to Coulomb's law, the force between two species is inversely proportional to the distance between them. That said, the bigger the atoms are, the greater the bond length should be to form a molecule.
As a result, for a greater bond length, the attraction force is lower than for a shorter bond length. This implies that large atoms would form weak bonds and small atoms would form strong bonds.
Bond energy is defined as the amount of energy required to break the bond. If a bond is weak, it would require a low amount of energy to break it. This is also true for energy of formation, as it's the same process taking place in the opposite direction.
Explanation:
1.
Sodium, or Na, is 57.47% of the composition,
Hydrogen, or H, is 2.520% of the composition,
and Oxygen, or O, is 40.001% of the composition.
This is because mass% = mass/total mass x 100%.
2. For every 1 mole of C6H12O6, you need 6 moles of water. Multiply the 5.2 moles you are trying to make by the 6 moles of water you need, and you will need 31.2 moles.
3. x = 7.2 x 4 / 2 = 14.4 mol
