1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
soldier1979 [14.2K]
2 years ago
8

Which of the following is true of copyright law? Group of answer choices It protects the design, color, or shape that is associa

ted with a particular product from being copied. It protects inventors rather than authors. It protects original, creative expression. It protects ideas and facts. It deals with invention that is original, nonobvious, and a novelty.
Business
1 answer:
marta [7]2 years ago
8 0

The following is true of copyright law : It protects original, creative expression.

<h3>What is Copyright ?</h3>

Copyright (or author's proper) is a prison time period used to explain the rights that creators have over their literary and inventive works. Works protected through copyright variety from books, music, paintings, sculpture, and films, to laptop

<h3>What is Copyright laws?</h3>

Copyright is a federal law. It is Title 17 of the United States Code. Copyright is the right of authors to control the use of their work for a limited period of time.

Copyright laws can be described as those laws which are useful for the protection of the original expression of an idea. Copyright laws are laws which are used to securely protect literary works, musical works, artistic works, as well as educational properties etc. The law does not offer protection from an idea. What it protects is the expression of that particular original idea. This means that another work could be done that is based on the same idea as a first work but this second work is not an infringement on the first.

Learn more about copyright law on:

brainly.com/question/24205575

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
You got asked to analyze a 5 year project for your firm. The project produces an annual revenue of $28,500, but requires an annu
hram777 [196]

Answer:

15,300

72.70%

Explanation:

After tax cash flow = (revenue - cost - depreciation) (1 - tax rate) + depreciation

Straight line depreciation expense = (Cost of asset - Salvage value) / useful life

($20,000 - $5,000) / 5 = $3,000

($28,500 - $5,000 - $3000) x (1 - 0.4) + $3000 = $15,300

Terminal year cash flow = after tax cash flow + salvage value

$15,300 + $5,000 = $20,300

Internal rate of return is the discount rate that equates the after-tax cash flows from an investment to the amount invested

IRR can be calculated with a financial calculator  

Cash flow in year 0 = $20,000.

Cash flow in year 1 - 4= $15,300

Cash flow in year 5 = $20,300

IRR = 72.70%

To find the IRR using a financial calculator:

1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.

2. After inputting all the cash flows, press the IRR button and then press the compute button.  

8 0
3 years ago
Company ABC makes kitchen appliances that have many features in great demand by professional chefs whose only interest is in the
weeeeeb [17]

Answer:

d. quality.

Explanation:

-Delivery area refers to the places in which the appliances can be delivered.

-Quantity refers to the amount of appliances that the company can produce and sell.

-Price refers to the amount of money that customers would pay for the appliances.

-Quality refers to the degree in which the appliances can meet the customer's requirements.

According to this, the answer is that based on its customers, ABC should try to dominate the market in quality because its products meet the expectations of professional chefs and that should be market to focus on as the company can have an important advantage by providing exactly what they need.

The other options are not right because professional chefs are interested on what they can do with this appliances and not on price, quantity or delievery area.

6 0
3 years ago
The decision-making process has five steps. After collecting relevant information and evaluating each alternative, the next step
Otrada [13]

Answer:

Select the course of action

Explanation:

Because it’s the next step after collecting relevant information and evaluating each alternatives

7 0
2 years ago
The partnership agreement of J. Hansen and D. Hernandez reflects differences in service and capital contributions as follows: (1
jasenka [17]

Answer:

$60,000

Explanation:

Hansen's annual salary allowance= 30,000

Hernandez's  annual salary allowance= 10,000

annual interest allowance of Hensen= 0.1 × 50,000= 5000

annual interest allowance of Hernandez= 0.1 × 50,000= 5000

Remaining balance=100000- 5000-5000-30000-10000= 50000

Share of each partner from remaining balance= 25000

Hensen's income= 25,000+ 5000+ 30000= 60,000

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Farrokh and Scheherezade Sharabianlou agreed to buy a building owned by Berenstein Associates for $2 million. They deposited $11
s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

This was an actual court case that ended in the Court of Appeals of the First District of California. Initially a lower court had ruled against the Sharabianlous and set extremely high compensations for damages to Berenstein. I do not understand why the court did it since it was proven that the land was contaminated and couldn't be sold under unless cleaned.

Finally, the court of appeals ruled in favor of the Sharabianlous, not because they thought they were right, but due to errors in the original trial.

The big issue in this case was that the contract signed by the Sharabianlous wasn't clear enough about what would happen if the land was not suitable for sale and they also failed to seek a lawyer when the contamination issues became obvious. If you read the case, even the real estate broker acted against the Sharabianlous when the property was appraised since he didn't tell the appraiser about the contamination issues.

The final ruling was made in 2010, 8 years after the parties engaged in the transaction, which gives us an idea of how complicated things can get when legal procedures are not followed, even though the outcome should be obvious.

If I was part of a jury and the case was about property that couldn't be sold due to contamination, I would probably vote in favor of the buyer, not the seller. It's common sense, but sometimes it you do not follow the appropriate legal path, common sense makes no sense at all.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Raymond Financing leases airplanes to airline companies. Raymond has just signed a 20-year lease agreement that requires annual
    12·1 answer
  • A company offering local telecommunications service combines resources with an international company that manufactures digital s
    7·2 answers
  • As flat screen tvs enter the maturity stage, what could happen to profits for individual firms?
    7·1 answer
  • Assuming that diminishing marginal utility applies to both pomegranates and bananas, if Vanessa buys more pomegranates and fewer
    6·1 answer
  • The market for kiwis is in equilibrium at a price of $1.50 per pound. if the government imposes a price ceiling in the market at
    5·1 answer
  • Accounts receivable $ 35,000 debit Allowance for uncollectible accounts 500 credit Net Sales 180,000 credit All sales are made o
    14·1 answer
  • The government uses indexing to revise tax brackets so that workers do not pay higher taxes just because
    8·1 answer
  • A firm has $300 million of assets that includes $40 million of cash and 10 million shares outstanding. If the firm uses $30 mill
    6·1 answer
  • Ben took some steps to use the concept of economies of scale in his company and failed. Which step caused his attempt to fail?
    10·1 answer
  • sells general merchandise directly from the manufacturer at a discount; items may be discontinued or have certain product flaws.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!