Answer:
Explanation:
We were informed from the question that;
BEFORE; the tax, 30,000 bottles of wine were sold every week at a price of $4 per bottle.
AFTER; After the tax, 25,000 bottles of wine are sold every week; consumers pay $6 per bottle and producers receive $3 per bottle (after paying the tax).
✓✓The amount of tax on wine = $6 - $3 = $3 per bottle
✓✓The tax burden on consumers = The amount paid after tax - The amount paid before tax
= $6 - $4
=$2 per bottle
✓✓The tax burden on Producers = Price received before tax - price received after tax
= $4 - $3
=$1 per bottle
Hence, The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $3 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $2 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $1 per bottle.
The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been smaller if the tax had been levied on consumers(FALSE)
This is false, since the The tax burden on Producers is $1 per bottle while that of The tax burden on consumer is $2 per bottle.
Answer:
A. whistle-blowing.
Explanation:
Whistle-blowing occurs when an employee exposes information of wrong-doing, unethical practice, or illegal actions. The information released can either be to internal authorities or it can be released to external parties.
When an employee does not have confidence that appropriate action will be taken on the information provided, employees tend to go to external parties with the information.
This was the case with EAC above where the staff were going to the press. EAC now set up a whistle-blowing framework that increased employee confidence and reduced turn-over.
Answer:
We should not lower taxes for the wealthiest Americans because they own and run a lot of companies and businesses that we use. Lower income Americans want their leaders to understand or know what it’s like to be less wealthy so they’ll be more sympathetic towards lower income people and won’t do everything out of the want for more money. If they have to pay lower taxes, then that takes away from their ability to sympathize with lower income homes, and that would upset a lot of people.
Answer:
Present Value of the loan = $19999.36 rounded off to $20000
Explanation:
The present value of loan will comprise of the present value of the principal amount of loan plus the present value of the interest that the loan will charge for the 3 year time period for which it is outstanding. As the interest payments are fixed and occur after equal intervals of time, they are considered an annuity.
To calculate the present value of the loan, we must discount the interest payments using the present value factor of annuity given in the question as 2.5771 and we must discount the principal to present value using the present value factor given in question as 0.7938.
We will first calculate the annual interest payment on loan.
Annual Interest payment = 20000 * 0.08 = 1600
Present value of the Interest payment - annuity = 1600 * 2.5771
Present value of the Interest payment - annuity = $4123.36
Present value of the Principal loan = 20000 * 0.7938
Present value of the Principal loan = $15876
Present Value of the loan = 15876 + 4123.36
Present Value of the loan = $19999.36 rounded off to $20000
Answer:
E. all of the above are examples of this adaptation.
Explanation:
Based on the information and answers provided it can be said that all of the above are examples of this adaptation. All of these cut backs were done in order to save money for more important aspects within the police policies and practices. While expanded use of technology systems and joint forces with other county governments were done in order to facilitate the jobs and cut down on time needed for certain practices which in term saved money.
