Answer:
Political and Legal
Explanation:
Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd. and BASF AG, two international pharmaceutical companies, were ordered to pay $725 million in fines for plotting to raise and fix prices of vitamins used in virtually every home in the U.S. This is an example of how <u>political and legal</u> forces affect the marketing environment.
Business organisations operate within a political system and legal framework. Political factors determine economic policies like taxation and regulations. Business decisions are subject to, and are affected by political and legal factors.
Governments formulate a series of legislations to monitor business activities and protect consumer and social interests.
Such laws would either create new opportunities or threats for the businesses in existence.
In the Scenario above Hoffman-LaRoche and BASF AG must have violated regulations that protect consumer interests put in place by the government by wanting consumers to pay too high for such necessities as vitamins and huge fines have been imposed on them.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
calculating the increase in the net operating income is as follows:
S.no Particulars and explanation Amount
1. Sales ( $268000 + 84000 ) 352000
2. Contribution ( 1 multiply with 40 percent) 140000
3. Fied expense ( $119200 plus $6200 ) 125400
4. Net operating income ( 2 step minus 3 step) $14600
therefore, net operating income increased by $ 14600 plus $12000
Note: the sales were not given, so i have taken or assumed. Please change the figure if there is different figure of sales in the question given.
Answer:
The total liabilities amounts to $200,000
Explanation:
The total liabilities of Asmine Smith is computed as:
Total Liabilities = Owing on Condo + Owning a Car
where
Owning on Condo is $190,000
Owning a Car is $10,000
Putting the values above:
= $190,000 + $10,000
= $200,000
Note: Sum Insured under the Insurance Policy, is neither a liability nor assets. And Premium paid is an expense, will be treated as Current Assets.
In a world that is synchronized on a global scale, trade between nations is constant. Imports cannot be reduced by 20% in order to close the trade deficit.
<h3>Why it is not possible to reduce imports?</h3>
There are certain nations that will be impacted if the United States decides to cut imports by 20%.
As a result, imports from the United States will likewise be restricted in other nations.
In other words, the United States may experience a fall in exports while attempting to reduce imports. The overall impact on trade imbalances could be minimal.
The trade conflict between the United States and China is a good illustration. China responded to the United States taxes on its imports by imposing its own levies. As a result, both countries suffered.
As a result, there is no quick fix for decreasing trade deficits. A more delicate balance between consumption and production must be achieved over time.
The manufacturing industries must have favorable policies and incentives to encourage consumer demand for locally made items.
Check out the link below to learn more about trade deficit;
brainly.com/question/28708620
#SPJ2
Answer:
Option C) Decrease in Total Assets , and No Effect on Equity
Explanation:
Telephone bill it's a Current Liability , if you decide to pay it as soon as you receive it you have to use Cash which is part of your Current Asset, so the impact it's a decreased in your Current Assets through the Cash component.
This movement has no impact in the Sotckholder Equity.
