Answer:
From least to most energetically favorable, the reactions are:
Glucose to Glucose-6-P (least) ; Glucose-6-P to Fructose-6-P; ATP to ADP and Pi; PEP to pyruvate (most favorable)
Explanation:
ΔG represents the free energy change that occurs during a chemical reaction. A reaction with negative free energy change is exergonic and spontaneous. Negative free energy change represents the fact that reactants have more free energy than products. The excess of the energy is released during the reaction and makes it a spontaneous process.
q`On the other hand, a reaction with positive free energy change is endothermic and non-spontaneous. These thermodynamically unfavorable reactions are coupled with other exergonic reactions to make them occur.
Among the given example, PEP to pyruvate has the highest negative free energy change (−14.8 kcal/mol) and therefore, is energetically most favorable. On the other hand, "Glucose to Glucose-6-P" has the highest positive free energy charge (+3.3 kcal/mol) making it energetically the most unfavorable reaction.
Answer would be D. The ecliptic would be path the Sun appears to move during the day.
D.The moon’s orbit must cross the plane of the ecliptic
Answer:
The world climate would drastically change.
Explanation:
- First off, both poles would have rapid expansion, with the freezing of more water near the poles.
- Many species of trees and plants would die out in certain areas, since they tend to be in their ideal locations, so the change in climate will make the northern parts of many habitats destroyed.
- Deserts would expand and the average temperature would rise.
- Also, many animals would also die out, because of the change in their environments.
- Conifers would shift southward, causing many forests / parts of forests to turn into wastelands, causing the earth's oxygen production to decrease.
What are you asking for here? we need a solid question not a statement.
i'd say that the statement is true. we cant define life because we do not know what life, in essence, is. we can define, however, the characteristice of all living things:
Movement
Respiration
Sensitivity
Nutrition
Excretion
Reproduction
Growth
MRS NERG
The answer is that infant circumcision is not ethically necessary. The reason to this is that there are no proof of evidence as to why it is ethically necessary for it to be done to an infant. It is also because other medical professionals thinks that doing circumcision in an infant will create issues in terms of their health, producing complications. That is why it is not ethically necessary for it to be done on an infant.
