Answer: The appropriate information that will be used to fill the blanks includes the following respectively:
-1.7
- increased
-70%
- 0.5
- decreased
- 50%
Explanation:
The green (topmost) data point at June 2011 shows a proportional change of about 1.7, which means that the native fish population INCREASED by about 70 percent when 95 percent of the lionfish were removed. In contrast, the orange data point at June 2011 shows a proportional change of about 0.5, which means that the native fish population DECREASED by about 50 percent when only a quarter of the lionfish were removed (a result that was almost the same as when none of the lionfish were removed).
The native fishes are being haunted by the lion fish, from the results, removing just few of the invasive lion fish will not make a difference. In other to help the native fish survive, many of the lion fish has to be removed.
Answer: I believe c is what you're looking for, D is also a viable option, but C is more likely.
Explanation:
Answer:
A Remora fish would attach itself to a shark and use the shark for transportation and eat all the food that is left over from the shark. The symbiosis relationship between them is a commensalism relationship because the remora is getting its food and the shark gets no benefit.
Answer:
Please see below
Explanation:
With the study on coat color, mice who could blend in better in the environment would be less likely to be detected bu the predator. Another hypothesis could be made in relevance to their legs. Longer legs would help the mice run quicker and increase the chances of escaping from the grasp of the predator, and hence, make survival more likely so it will be selected for. While shorter legged mice will be selected against since they are at a disadvantage.
