Answer:
The net income is $150,500 and the return on assets is 20.06 %
Explanation:
The formula for computing net income and return on assets is shown below and the computation is also made.
Net income = Sales revenue × Profit margin
= $2,150,000 × 7%
= $150,500
Return on assets = Net income ÷ total assets
= $150,500 ÷ $750,000
= 0.2006
= 20.06 %
Thus, the net income is $150,500 and the return on assets is 20.06 %
Ian is a uniquely good position here: the truth happens to be one of the best explanations he could possibly give. The fact that he quit his job to look after his sick mother, assuming that his former employer has positive things to say about him, is a solid reflection of his character and a sign that he was out of the job market not due to a lack of options, but a need to take care of a sick family member.
Ian should tell the truth, and explain the decision thoroughly to demonstrate the kind of person he is to the prospective employer, and what his priorities are.
Answer: Servant leader
Explanation: Servant leader is that leader whose main goal is to serve his followers and subordinates. All the actions that a servant leader takes is to make sure that the needs of his followers are taken care of.
This theory is sometimes used in management also we the perception that employees are the most important asset and if they are provided with proper facility their productivity will be at full, leading to development of organization.
In the given case, Starbucks CEO is taking utmost care of his employees. Hence, it is clearly a Servant leader example.
Answer:
C.principal-agent problems.
Explanation:
The acquisition of Movo Automobile is a typical example of AGENCY COST. Under the Agency cost theory, managers are agents of shareholders who represents principal in the principal - agent problem.
Agency cost is a situation where agents become selfish and pursue strategies and policies that will promote the self interest of agents and cause dissatisfaction to principals.
Answer:
B. The lessor does not have the right to stop delivery in transit due to the lessee's breach of the lease agreement; instead, the lessor must deliver the goods to the lessee in spite of the breach, and then sue the lessee for damages.
Explanation:
During the transit of goods, if the lessor learns of a breach of the lease agreement, he has every right to stop the delivery of the goods in transit by notifying the goods carrier or bailee. Since the carrier of the goods reports directly to the lessor, once he receives instructions from the lessor to stop delivery of goods, and he still has sufficient time, the delivery should be stopped.
Once the goods are reclaimed, the lessor can then decide to sue to recover damages. He can also, decide to cancel the contract at that point
