Answer:
It has no effect
Explanation:
M1 includes the currency and checking accounts. The bank account will decrease by 200 (cheking deposit) and increase currency by 200. So it will be the same as before the transactions.
The M1 money supply will not change as a result of this transaction.
In other words, M1 contains cash and near cash equivalent, this transaction do not increase or reduce these concepts.
Answer:
B). The further in the future you receive a dollar, the less it is worth today.
Explanation:
The second option asserts a true claim that 'the later we receive a dollar in future, the less it is worth today' as the market value of dollar can be seen significantly rising and therefore, it's value is much higher in relation to the value of other currencies across the globe. If a person receives a dollar today, it's worth can be much higher in the upcoming time and therefore, a lower amount today can become a huge amount tomorrow, if invested properly today. Thus, <u>option B</u> offers a true statement while the others state incorrect claims.
The group or organization matchup is given below;
- Non-state actor - terrorist.
- International Organization -World Trade Organization, United Nations.
- Nation-state - Canada.
<h3>What is a Nation state?</h3>
The term nation-state is known to be a any country that is territorially held together as a sovereign state.
Note that in this kind of country, it is one that is governed in the name of a community of its own people who identify or see themselves as a nation.
See full question below
Match the group or organization on the left with its correct category on the right.
non-state actor:
terrorist
International Organization:
World Trade Organization,
United Nations
nation-state: Canada
Learn more about Nation-state from
brainly.com/question/19454824
Technology wise: Apple or Microsoft
Food wise: McDonalds or KFC
Answer:
Option A. Liable, because notice to Emmett is notice to Fridley.
Explanation:
The reason is that the principle is liable for the outcome of the Emmett actions in the principle's behalf. So it is clear that Fridley is liable. The agent have to work in the best interest of its principal which means that the failure to notify the additional tax liability to Fridley was part of agent's fiduciary duty. This means that the principle can sue its agent for the consequences of not placing the sufficient care to its principle.
The Fridley is also responsible because Emmett is acting as Fridley which means the notice to Emmett is actually notice to Fridley.
