The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by the U.S. Congress on May 30, 1854. It allowed people in the territories ofKansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. The Actserved to repeal the Missouri Compromise of 1820 which prohibited slavery north of latitude 36°30´.
Answer: Slaves could not bring a civil suit to the supreme court because the Supreme Court says that blacks cannot be citizens and that Congress has no power to outlaw slavery in any territory.
Explanation:
Answer:
The middle colonies, were different from the New England and southern colonies. These colonies are also known as, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Deleware, which contained river systems and parts. Their 3 rivers are the Hudson, Deleware, and the Susquehanna. The New England colonies contained Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire. They had harsh soil, which led to subsistence farms, fishing (including whaling), and shipbuilding/small-scale factories were introduced. In the Southern colonies (Maryland, Virginia, South Carolina, and Georgia), plantation systems developed. Farms were scattered, as well as slave labor, and export of cash crops.
Explanation:
Answer:
Communist Party of the United States of America
Explanation:
hope it helps
The correct answer is turning point for the way the laws of colonial Virginia distinguished people of different races
In 1676, one hundred years before the declaration of independence, the state of Virginia was the scene of the so-called Bacon Rebellion, in which landowners, slaves and servants came together, and which can only be stifled with the dispatch of English troops. It began as a product of the demand of the wealthy landowner Nathaniel Bacon, whose properties were located in the border area, for a more effective war policy against "the Indian". This demand to local authorities extended to the denunciation of an unfair tax policy, the arbitrary distribution of public offices and the lack of protection for farmers against the indigenous threat, in “a mixture of populist resentment against the rich and border hatred against the Indians ”. (Apart from the huge historical-social distances, we could say that it is similar to a Trump that today rages against the political and economic establishment while agitating a strongly xenophobic and anti-immigrant program).
The significance of this rebellion was that it brought together a heterogeneous social spectrum, attracting the dissatisfaction of slaves and servants against their living conditions, showing a potentially dangerous social union. In addition to the problem of indigenous hostility and the danger of slave revolts, the colonial elite had to do with the class anger of the poor whites - the servants, the tenants, the urban poor, the landless, the taxpayers, soldiers and sailors. In fact, after the Bacon Rebellion in 1760, "eighteen new attempts were made to overthrow the colonial governments and eight black revolts in South Carolina and New York." (The Other History of the United States). In this context, racism was the preferred ideological artifact used by the dominant classes to prevent the development of these social ties. But under the strong fiscal pressure that ensued the wars waged by England, which increased poverty in the lower strata and affected sectors of the local elites, they began to defend nationalist ideals as a way to monopolize the extraction of resources while unleashing potential rebellions. depending on national unity.
