Answer:
B
Explanation:
Insider trading when you trade with non public information (you are an insider) and it can be illegal.
Wiki
Insider trading is the trading of a public company's stock or other securities based on material, nonpublic information about the company. In various countries, some kinds of trading based on insider information is illegal. This is because it is seen as unfair to other investors who do not have access to the information, as the investor with insider information could potentially make larger profits than a typical investor could make.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
In simple words, The fundamental mistake throughout the attribution refers to the propensity for individuals to overemphasise personal attributes and neglect environmental variables in evaluating actions of others.
For instance, in one experiment whenever something unpleasant occurred to somebody else, participants blamed the actions or attitude of that individual 65 per cent of the total times. Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is B.
a) Internal consistency
Explanation:
The consistency of different items meant to measure the same thing within the test. An internal consistency contains a special case of reliability to split half, the scores of two halves of a single test are compared. This comparison of two tests tends to index reliability.
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
ZERO amount would the insurance company pay for vandalism that does $425 of damage to a home if the insured homeowner has a $500 deductible.
( Because the deductible exceeds the loss or the damage. The loss is $425 and the deductible is $ 500, so here the deductible exceeds the loss hence the insurance company will not pay anything).
People like you pay premiums to insurance companies to cover potential losses related to their property. Insurance companies receive these premiums and aggregate them into money pools. These funds are available to cover losses incurred by pool members.
When you report a car accident to the insurance company, the insurance company will send an adjuster to assess the damage. The expert's first task is to decide whether to classify the vehicle as a total loss. Assuming the vehicle is a total loss, the expert performs a valuation and assigns a value to the vehicle.
Learn more about vandalism at
brainly.com/question/13646632
#SPJ4
