Answer: Yes, they could save about $5 less per month and still have enough money.
Explanation: Arthur is 10 years old. Tuition for one year at a public two-year college is $3,125. In 8 years, tuition is expected to increase 32%. Arthur’s family plans to save for his college costs for 5 years. If the family saves $75 per month, will there be enough money to pay for the expected cost of one year at the college when he is 18?
Yes they could save $75 and still have enough money to pay for one year at the college when he is 18.
Workings=
12( months) x 5 (years)= 60 months
If the family save $75 monthly for 5 years
$75 x 60 (months)= $4500
At the end of the family 5 years savings, they would be having a total of $4500 which would be more than enough to pay for the expected cost of one year at the college when he is 18.
Depending on where you take your snake, what condition its in and wether it is male or female (females are worth more)will all effect its value.
Answer:
a.(bees OR flowers) AND dickinson
Explanation:
We defenitevily want Dickinson in our search as it is the writer we are interest on. Thus the statment should be and AND as an OR may leave it off the equation. and the system will look for bees or flowers from pretty much any writer. Dickinson is an exclusive factor.
Then, from the topoc of his poetry we look for bees or flowers at an equal interest. With findings of just one of these two concepts we are satisfied thereofre and OR statement is the way to go.
<span>agreement to modify an existing contract </span>
<span>The looser interpretation of the law created a multimember executive whereas the strict interpretation created a one-person executive.
This filling in of the blanks creates an appropriate and meaningful sentence. Laws may be open to various interpretations. If "person" was thought to be a singular physical person, that would give rise to a strict interpretation for the purposes of the law and a "one-person executive". Operational definitions are important, and "person" could be interpreted as an "entity" or a "collective" in which case the looser interpretation of a law would be at play to create the "multi-member executive".</span>
