Answer:
<u>Mistake of ignoring secondary effects</u>
Explanation:
Whenever there arises an adverse impact of a policy and it's implementation, owing to ignorance of secondary consequences, it is termed as ignoring secondary effects.
In short, it refers to assessing and viewing only the positive aspects of a policy or a move, meanwhile not taking into consideration the other adverse consequences which are also associated with the same policy.
In the given case, the environmentalists have only considered the generation of alternative sources of energy via windmills which will lead to preservation of fossil fuels. The proposed policy has been implemented without taking into account it's flip side i.e the harm it causes to bat population and migratory birds.
Thus, it can be stated that the environmentalists herein only considered the favorable outcome of a policy implementation and ignored the adverse effect of the same. Hence, they are said to have committed the mistake of ignoring the secondary effects.
Answer:
B. money market funds
Explanation:
The most limited definition of money, M1, consists just of cash and various bank accounts that allow check writing. Money in circulation includes cash, traveler's checks, demand deposits, and other types of checkable deposits.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure its 2346
Explanation:
might be wrong considering Edge loves to move answers around. <em>yes they do that....</em>
Answer:
by writing the answer
Explanation:
I would advise figuring the question out first.
