A conversation between Newfoundland and Canada in 1949.
Canada: Well Newfoundland. I think the time has come to talk about a possible annexation to us.
- <u>Newfoundland:</u> Well yes. I guess its about time we got together to discuss some matters regarding this.
- <u>Canada:</u> How is your financial situation going?
- <u>Newfoundland:</u> We have had better times... we are nearly reaching $ 50 million in debt. I was wondering if you could help me out with this. I promise to manage stuff responsibly from now on.
- <u>Canada:</u> That proposal does not suit me at all. I will give you a hand if you agree to join me as a province.
- <u>Newfoundland:</u> I guess I have not much of a choice. I agree with your proposal.
- <u>Canada:</u> Well. It appears we have a deal then!
Democratic techniques in the modern world have embodied the ideology of democracy, but the overall structure has been diluted over time. "The dominant ideologies in modern capitalist states have tended to dilute the democratic idea, to dissolve it altogether into the concept of liberalism, to offer liberalism not as a complement to, but as a substitute for, democracy as popular power"
Gangs, Pasta and Drugs of course
Answer: False
due to the fact that no writing existed back then it would be impossible for us to know but most likely it did not
Answer:
King’s notion of nonviolence had six key principles. First, one can resist evil without resorting to violence. Second, nonviolence seeks to win the “friendship and understanding” of the opponent, not to humiliate him Third, evil itself, not the people committing evil acts, should be opposed. Fourth, those committed to nonviolence must be willing to suffer without retaliation as suffering itself can be redemptive. Fifth, nonviolent resistance avoids “external physical violence” and “internal violence of spirit” as well: “The nonviolent resister not only refuses to shoot his opponent but he also refuses to hate him”.
Explanation:
