Answer:
A. Plessy v. Ferguson was that separate but equal facilities did not violate the Constitution
Explanation:
Just took the test got 100%
Answer: how peer pressure to conform would influence the judgment and individuality of a test subject.
Explanation:
Answer:
Answer:
The mandate system allowed Europeans take control over the resources of Asian countries.
Explanation:
World War 1 altered the Middle East in a manner not experienced before. The Europeans had finally tookover specific countries such as Iraq, Palestine, Syria, Lebanon and Arabia. In the course of the World War 1, Britain and France deployed agents and armies to the Middle East to cause rebellion and have a stronghold on Syria, Pakistan and Iran.
In 1916, British and French diplomats came to an unanimous decision to secretly split the Middle East. The decision was at some points substituted with a different agreement which developed a mandate system of British and French control. Based on the mandate system, Lebanon and Syria were apportioned to the French while Palestine, Iraq and three Ottoman provinces were apportioned to the British.
The claming of the conqured Asian countries were overseered by the winning countries as it was thought that the conquered nations are not set to lead their activities by themselves. The mandate system gave authority to the Europeans mostly the Britain and France as they established their control and affluence on the Middle East. This provoked more Arabs who hoped to have more say over their resources instead of being guided by the Europeans.
The answer is a "Hermit".
A hermit is a man who lives alone and apart from society, for the most part for religious reasons. In Christianity, the term was initially connected to a Christian who carries on with the eremitic life out of a religious conviction, to be specific the Desert Theology of the Old Testament i.e., the 40 years meandering in the desert that was intended to cause a change in heart.
<span>One of the major advantages of judges being appointed is that they are usually chosen on their basis of how well they have done their jobs, are they fair, have they done exceptional work in deciding their cases judgements. One of the disadvantages is that sometimes bad judges can slip thru the cracks when appointed that may not have the right moral compass to judge cases fairly. As such some judges can also be swayed to look the otherway on issues that they strongly oppose that their constituents may favor.</span>
