1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alekssandra [29.7K]
2 years ago
13

You have just won ​$20,000 in the state​ lottery, which promises to pay you ​$1,000​ (tax free) every year for the next

twenty years. The interest rate is​ 5%. ​Note: all payments made at the beginning of each year. Part 2 In​ reality, you receive the first payment of ​$1,000​ today, which is worth ​$    enter your response here today. ​(Round your response to the nearest penny.​)
Business
1 answer:
prohojiy [21]2 years ago
5 0

The value of the second​ $1,000 payment is worth $ 952.38

The net present value is given by the expression as shown below:

         NPV = \frac{future value }{(1 + r)^{n}  }

Plugging the values in the above expression,          

Future value =$1,000

                    r=0.05

                    n=1

            NPV = \frac{1000}{(1 + 0.5)^{1}  }

           NPV = 952.38

The value of the second​ $1,000 payment is worth $ 952.38

<h3>What Is Net Present Value (NPV)?</h3>

Net present value (NPV) is the difference between the present value of cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows over a period of time. NPV is used in capital budgeting and investment planning to analyze the profitability of a projected investment or project. NPV is the result of calculations used to find today’s value of a future stream of payments.

Net Present Value (NPV) Formula:

NPV = \frac{R_{t}  }{(1 + r)^{t}  }

where:

R_{t} =Net cash inflow-outflows during a single period

i =Discount rate or return that could be earned in alternative investments.

t=Number of timer periods

Learn  more about NPV on:

brainly.com/question/13228231

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Caterer agrees with Bride to cater Bride's wedding reception for $12 per plate. On the wedding day, Caterer calls Bride saying t
balandron [24]
The $16 is not enforceable because of a preexisting duty.
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is correct regarding variable costing and absorption costing income statements for a company t
Arturiano [62]

Answer:<em> Option (A) is correct.</em>

A basic difference between absorption and variable costing is that the absorption costing approaches fixed factory overhead as a product cost, while variable costing approaches the same as a period cost.

Where production of inventory outpaces sales, fixed factory overhead under absorption costing approach will remain on balance sheet as unsold inventory; therefore keeping the costs off of income statement until inventory is sold. Whereas; under variable costing, fixed factory overhead will be expended to the income statement in given period .

8 0
3 years ago
Beginning at age 27, Kimberly invests $2000 per year for ten years and then never sets aside another penny. Kaitlyn waits ten ye
zavuch27 [327]

Answer:

Kimberly will have $27,632.90 while Kaitlyn will $188,921.57  at age 67.

Explanation:

The relevant formula to use here is the formula for the Future Value (FV) of an Annuity FVA.

The future value of an annuity refers to the value at a specific date in the future of an investment or payment that recur regularly over a certain period.

The formula for calculating FVA is as follws:

FV = M × {[(1 + r)^n - 1] ÷ r} ................................. (1)

Where,

FV = Future value of an annuity or investment stream

M = Amount of each annuity

r = Interest rate

n = number of periods the investment will be made

FV of Kimberly:

Since Kimberly will never sets aside another penny after 10 years, we have:

M = $2,000

r = 7% = 0.07

n = 10

Substituting the values for Kimberly into equation (1), we have:

Kimberly FV  = 2,000 × {[(1 + 0.07)^10 - 1] ÷ 0.07}

                     = 2,000 × {[(1.07)^10 - 1] ÷ 0.07}

                     = 2,000 × {[1.96715135728957 - 1] ÷ 0.07}

                     = 2,000 × {0.96715135728957 ÷ 0.07}                    

                     = 2,000 × 13.8164479612795  

Kimberly FV = $27,632.90

FV of Kaitlyn:

M = $2,000

r = 7% = 0.07

n = 30

  Kaitlyn FV  = 2,000 × {[(1 + 0.07)^30 - 1] ÷ 0.07}

                     = 2,000 × {[(1.07)^30 - 1] ÷ 0.07}

                     = 2,000 × {[7.61225504266203 - 1] ÷ 0.07}

                     = 2,000 × {6.61225504266203  ÷ 0.07}

                     = 2,000 × 94.4607863237433  

   Kaitlyn FV = $188,921.57  

Therefore, Kimberly will have $27,632.90 while Kaitlyn will $188,921.57  at age 67.

8 0
4 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a repayment plan option?
max2010maxim [7]

Answer: Loan forgiveness repayment plan.

Explanation:

The Extended Repayment Plan: This is a repayment plan option whereby the loan can be paid back for a period of about 25 years.

The Income-Sensitive Repayment Plan: This is a repayment plan option for those who want low income. Here, payment can either increase or reduce based on what the person earns annually.

The Graduated Repayment Plan: This is a repayment plan option which increases every two years.

The loan forgiveness repayment plan is not a repayment plan option.

4 0
3 years ago
A company makes two products in a single plant. It runs this plant for 100 hours each week. Each unit of product A that the comp
Olegator [25]

Answer:

Check the explanation

Explanation:

As per current limitation of emission, below will be the optimal solution.

The first attached image below is the screenshot of LP Table to be used to get the result -

The second attached image below is the formula used to get the result -

The third attached image below is the screenshot of solver with constraints, decision variable and objective -

the result is in the fourth attached image;

Product A - 15 units

Product B - 60 units

Total Contribution - 135000

Now EPA has allowed one additional unit of chemical emission. Hence, we will change the available quantity of chemical emission to 61 from 60. Rest all will be same as mentioned in earlier part. The fifth attached image below will be the updated optimal solution -

From the image, it is clear that company has 1 additional unit of particulate emission left (240-239), hence company can reduce the particulate emission by 1 units. Below will be the optimal solution -

Product A - 14

Product B - 61

Contribution - 136000 (increase in contribution by 1000)

Now, we can see that contribution has increased by 1000 which is equal to the contribution of 1 unit of product A.

1 unit of Product A is responsible for 4 unit of particulate emission. Hence company can reduce the emission further 4 units.

Final output will be as follows -

Product A - 13

Product B - 61

Contribution - 135000

Total Particulate Emission used = 13*4 + 61*3 = 235

Total Reduction in Particulate Emission = 240-235 = 5 units

Hence, company should willing to reduce the Particulate Emission by 5 units without affecting its Contribution Maximization objective.

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • In one or two sentences, describe which is greater: gross pay or net pay.
    13·2 answers
  • These people are redefining what it means to be a celebrity by being approachable, conversational, and authentic to millions of
    10·1 answer
  • Welfare is a general term for economic and social assistance programs.
    13·1 answer
  • The cost of securing public safety during protest activities is the primary responsibility of ________.
    8·1 answer
  • The net income reported on the income statement for the current year was $295,000. Depreciation recorded on fixed assets and amo
    6·1 answer
  • Your boyfriend is living in an apartment complex that has had a recent rash of robberies. He has​ $5,000 worth of rare coins. Wh
    11·1 answer
  • On December 31 the Income Summary account of Cook Company has a debit balance of $18,000 after revenue of $49,000 and expenses o
    13·1 answer
  • The US and _____ signed the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement in 1978.
    8·2 answers
  • Complete the proportion you can use to convert 60 inches to centimeters. Enter your answer with one decimal place. 1 inch 2.54 c
    11·1 answer
  • Which one of the following is not a primary component of an internal control system?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!