It is a true statement that the preferred stockholders must receive their current-year dividends before the common stockholders can receive any dividends.
<h3>What is a
preferred stockholders?</h3>
These are the owners of the preferred stock that is treated as a class of stock that granted certain rights that differ from common stocks.
The preferred shareholders have higher priority over a company's income which makes them being are paid dividends before the common shareholders. The common stockholders are last in line when it comes to company assets which makes them being paid out after creditors, bondholders, and preferred shareholders.
Therefore, It is a true statement that the preferred stockholders must receive their current-year dividends before the common stockholders can receive any dividends.
Read more about preferred stockholders
brainly.com/question/28052663
#SPJ4
Answer:
Total revenue would rise in the short run
Explanation:
A price elascitiy of 0.4 indicates that demand is inelastic.
Inelastic demand means that a small change in price has little or no effect on quantity demanded. The absolute value of inelastic demand is less than 1.
If the cost of the crude oil increases, the price of gasoline would increase too. Because demand is price inelastic , there would be little or no change in the quantity demanded of gasoline as a result total revenue would increase as a result of the rise in price.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
Private brands are normally run by a small group of people making and selling. Over a large company or international brands who are more focused on marketing and making more money then they put into their product and pour their money into factory and factory employees to make their products for them. Which would result in making the quality and details not as paid attention to as a private brand would focus on.
Answer: B) Owners can refuse to rent to prospects who have long hair and ride motorcycles.
Explanation:
The 1968 Federal Fair Housing Laws established that it is illegal to discriminate or refuse housing to a person based on <em>race or color; religion; national origin; familial status or age—includes families with children under the age of 18 and pregnant women; disability or handicap, or sex. </em>
Option A would be considered as a violation of the no discrimination based on race stipulation of the law.
Option C would be a violation of the no discrimination based on sex stipulation of the law.
And Option D would be a subtle violation but nonetheless a violation of the no discrimination based on race stipulation.
Option B is the only option that doesn't seem to break any of the stipulations of the 1968 act.
