Answer:
The opening text to EVEREST explains the difficulty of climbing Mt. Everest but then talks about how expeditions are set up to held people reach the summit. This film tells the true story of one such expedition in 1996 where the climbers ran into a disastrous storm with tragic results.
EVEREST is a very grim, depressing and rather unpleasant movie that I really wish was better. I had high hopes going into the film but sadly there are all sorts of problems that overshadow what great qualities that are on display. I think the biggest problem is the opening hour where we get to know the characters and like a lot of the disaster movies from the 1970s these scenes are all too familiar and they really don't add much. I think the direction of Baltasar Kormakur could have handled these scenes much better or at least added a bit of energy to them.
The film kicks into high gear once the climb actually starts and once the storm hits. The greatest aspect to the film is the terrific cinematography, which is just downright beautiful and at times breath-taking. Even greater is the fact that it really does show you the dangers of making such a climb and I think the one thing the film does brilliantly is show you what a remarkable accomplishment it would be to reach the top of the mountain. I've seen several documentaries on Everest but this movie really does a remarkable job at showing how difficult the climb would be.
The performances are all very good. Jason Clarke, Jake Gyllenhaal, Emily Watson, Keira Knightley and Josh Brolin are all very good in their roles. All of the roles are rather small but it's easy to see what would attract them to such a project. The film also benefits from being technically very good with the score, the editing, sound effects and various other effects coming across quite good.
As I said, the first hour of the film is rather sluggish and I think the overall pacing is just off. The film features some intense scenes of action and peril but as I said the overall feel is just so depressing and unpleasant that I really wouldn't recommend the movie to people. I really wish the film was better but in the end it falls well short of being a good movie.
Explanation:
After a country loses a war it would be logical that to keep citizens’ enthusiasm up, it would be required to disinform the citizens for them to continue working hard and not revolting. Unfortunately disinforming citizens wasn’t the only tactic governments like Germany used to counter loss of enthusiasm upon their citizens. Arresting protestors, propaganda, abusive police powers, and censorship were also tactics Germany used to combat loss of enthusiasm. Examples of propaganda Germany publicized were normally pictures with resilient soldiers saying things like “we’re almost there” and other phrases to keep citizens' hopes up and even enlist to go to war.
The Treaty of Versailles was created after WWI to get things even with all countries affected by the war. This left Germany in a very bad position considering all the debts they had to pay to the other countries they hurt. With this high debt and lingering guilt, it left Germany with anger worthy of starting another war. Germany ended up disinforming their population and deluding their population into thinking it was the fault of minorities like Jews that caused the mishaps of war.
Haha did the dirty deed
hope it helps :):):)
A good paragraph has 5 to 7 sentences.
This counts as rhythm, the poet uses this to embed this into you mind and also to prove is point. But also there is a meaning to it as well.
answer:
1. you have to have a main topic
2. decide what your gonna write about
3. and the research
4. the disscussion
Explanation:
these are thesis steps but I don't know if they are right in steps
