Answer:
Anderson Co. 3,100 shares at $18 per share
Munter Ltd. 10,200 shares at $57 per share
King Co. 5,600 preferred stock at $42 per stock
a. Prepare the entry for the security sale on January 15, 2021.
- Dr Cash 58,880
- Cr Investment in Anderson Co. stock AFS 52,200
- Cr Realized gain on stock AFS 6,680
b. Prepare the journal entry to record the security purchase on April 17, 2021.
- Dr Investment in Castle's stock AFS 38,160
- Cr Cash 38,160
c. Compute the unrealized gains or losses.
- unrealized gain = $40,800 (gain in Munter) - $11,200 (loss in King) - $13,960 (loss in Castle) = $15,640
d. Prepare the adjusting entry for Vaughn on December 31, 2021.
- Dr Investment in Munter's stock 40,800
- Cr Investment in King's stock 11,200
- Cr Investment in Castle's stock 13,960
- Cr Unrealized gain - other comprehensive income 15,640
Answer:
The allowance can be taken based on:
a reduction (production) of the oil and gas reserves.
Explanation:
A limited partnership's allowance for depletion is a special form of depreciation used to account for the gradual reduction in the value of natural resources based on their usage or consumption. There are two methods for recognizing depletion of natural resources. They are the cost depletion method, which is based on usage, and the percentage depletion method, which is a percentage of gross earnings. Then, depletion is different from depreciation, in that depreciation is for tangible assets, while depletion is for natural assets.
Answer:
10.92%
Explanation:
The formula and the computation of the estimated cost of equity capital is shown below:
Stock price = Next year dividend ÷ (cost of equity - expected dividend growth rate)
We assume the cost of equity be X
$34 = $3.10 ÷ (cost of equity - 1.8%)
$34 X - $34 × 1.8X = $3.10
After solving this,
The cost of equity would be 10.92%
Answer:
Legal but Unethical
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Gander's business conduct is Legal but Unethical. It is legal because since it is a developing country there is most likely no law against the amount that the company's must pay employees. On the other hand it is unethical because the company is taking advantage of the necessity of the workers and is paying them nonliving wages.
If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.