COMPLETE PROBLEM
Lana, a ten-year-old child, is run over by a car negligently driven by Mitchell. Lana, at the time of the accident, was acting reasonably and without negligence. Clark, a newspaper reporter, photographs Lana while she is lying in the street in great pain. Two years later, Perry, the publisher of a newspaper, prints Clark's picture of Lana in his newspaper as a lead to an article concerning the negligence of children. The caption under the picture reads: "They ask to be killed." Lana, who has recovered from the accident, brings suit against Clark and Perry. What result? Explain.
Explanation:
Judgement for Lana against Perry but not against Clark. The facts make out a case against Perry for the tort of invasion of privacy in particular placing another in a false light (INVASION OF PRIVACY:FALSE LIGHT). Section 652E of the restatement imposes liability for publicity which places another in a false light. It is unlikely that Perry could utilize the first amendment as a defense because Lana was neither a public official nor a public figure. Even if that defense were available, it is forfeited if Perry acted with "malice", which appears to be the case here because Perry acted in reckless disregard of the truth. Clark did not commit the tort of intrusion because he photographed an event that occurred in public.
A tax preparer's high ethical standards protect taxpayers by option A: Providing them with an accurate return, including all tax benefits to which they are entitled.
A tax preparer's high ethical standards protect the tax preparer through except option D: Eliminating the need for preparer due diligence notes Mark for follow up
The statement that is accurate is option C: Beatrice may claim EITC based on Jordyn if her AGI was higher than Beth's and if she files first.
<h3>What are tax ethics?</h3>
Tax ethics, is known to be the term for the taxpayer's moral duty to pay taxes, is influenced by their interaction with the government as citizens. Tax evasion and tax ethics are frequently used synonymously.
When filing taxes, a tax preparer should take certain ethical considerations into account:
- Inform the appropriate third parties about the suspected fraudulent behavior.
- Inform the IRS and other tax authorities of the alleged fraudulent activities.
- Think about ending the engagement.
Therefore, one can say that anyone who prepares a tax return may now be held accountable for errors committed in filing a return for someone else due to a change in tax regulations that took effect more than ten years ago. An IRS monetary penalty may be imposed on a tax preparer who made errors on your return.
Learn more about ethical standards from
brainly.com/question/24519475
#SPJ1
Answer:
- ,000 new apartments will make the equilibrium price = $1,500
- 10,000 new apartments will make the equilibrium price = $1,000
- 15,000 new apartments will make the equilibrium price = $500
Explanation:
<u>Rent</u> <u>Demand</u> <u>Supply</u>
2,500.00 10000 15000
2,000.00 12500 12500
1,500.00 15000 10000
1,000.00 17500 7500
500.00 20000 5000
The equilibrium quantity is 12,500 apartments with a $2,000 rent per month. If the government wants to lower the equilibrium rent price by increasing the supply of apartments, then it must build:
- 5,000 new apartments will make the equilibrium price = $1,500
- 10,000 new apartments will make the equilibrium price = $1,000
- 15,000 new apartments will make the equilibrium price = $500
Answer:
Mark will have at the end of six years the amount of $25,865.74
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
First investment = 2500
Investment increasing at rate of 10%
Interest rate = 13%
t=6 years
Present value is given by formula = C * [((1+g)^n/(1+i)^n) - 1 ] / (g-i)
C is first value = 2,500
g is increase in investment = 0.10
i is intrest rate = 0.13
n is no of years = 6
Putting values into the equation
P = 2500* [((1+ 0.10)^6/(1+0.13)^6) - 1 ] / (0.10-0.13) 1.771561 2.08195
P = 2500* [((1.10)^6/(1.13)^6) - 1 ] / (-0.03)
P = 2500* [0.8509142870866 - 1 ] / (-0.03)
P = 2500* (-0.14908571)/ (-0.03)
P = 2500* 4.9695236
P=$12,423.809
Future value = P*(1+i)^t
= $12,423.809 *(1+0.13)^6
= $25,865.74
Mark will have at the end of six years the amount of $25,865.74
