The social order of pre-Revolutionary France was composed of three states: the 1st state was made up of clergymen, the 2nd state included all the nobility, and the 3rd state was formed by the rest of the population of France, including the peasantry, the bourgeoisie, and the city workers.
The experiences of the nobility and the bourgeoisie were very different during this period. The nobiity included around 1-2% of the population of the country. They were mostly exempt from taxes and for the most part, did not have a job. On the other hand, the bourgeoisie was a large percentage of the population, and carried a significant tax burden. This class was the most educated and wealthiest part of the 3rd State, and they resented the privileges of the nobles, in particular the tax exemptions. The conflict between these classes was a reason for the French Revolution.
Answer:
Critical thinking is the process of reasoning, analyzing, and making important decisions. It's an important skill in making career
decisions.
Explanation:
Critical thinking involves an intentional judgment to reflect on what to believe or how to respond to close examination, experience, oral or textual manifestation, and even extraneous propositions. It is also linked to the definition of the content and value of the observation object.
Critical thinking involves an intentional judgment to reflect on what to believe or how to respond to close examination, experience, oral or textual manifestation, and even extraneous propositions. It is also linked to the definition of the content and value of the observation object.
Based on this reasoning, we can conclude that critical thinking is the process of reasoning, analyzing, and making important decisions. It is an important skill in career decision making.
D they surprised the Persians by crossing the Aegean Sea to attack
B.
is the right answer because it said about Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts redraw the congressional districts in his state to give his party unfair political advantage.
It is C. The Secretary of State William Seward argued that the U.S. should buy Alaska because U.S. wants expand, and Alaska had valuable resources.
