1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Harrizon [31]
2 years ago
13

When steve and kathy divorced, they agreed to share the responsibility for the care and raising of their children. In the contex

t of child custody, this arrangement exemplifies?
Social Studies
1 answer:
seropon [69]2 years ago
7 0

When Steve and Kathy divorced, they agreed to share the responsibility for the care and raising of their children. In the context of child custody, this arrangement exemplifies joint custody.

What is joint custody?

Sharing of parental responsibilities for the child is included in joint custody. Joint custody involves both parents actively participating in the child's upbringing, as opposed to exclusive custody, when one parent has complete control. Physical and legal custody might be shared equally, as well as both.

What are the disadvantages of joint custody?

Youngsters can experience alienation and confusion because they are frequently in a condition of limbo and are continually moving between their parents' homes. Additionally, keeping up two homes for the child's needs is frequently very difficult for parents.

Learn more about Joint Custody: brainly.com/question/9117788

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Identify each statement as either a critique or a defense of the trait approach.
Reika [66]

1) A definitive list of leadership qualities has not been established by the strategy, and the list that has emerged appears to be endless.

2) Situations have not been taken into account by the strategy.

3) The meaning of the data is subject to a lot of subjective interpretation, and the data are not always based on reliable research.

What is a common criticism of personality trait theories?

Descriptive theories like trait theories try to pinpoint specific dimensions or traits of personality.People do not behave as consistently from one situation to the next as trait theories would typically predict, which is one of the main criticisms of trait theories.

Learn more about personality trait theories here:

brainly.com/question/25728564

#SPJ4

3 0
1 year ago
A historian is studying urban history in Chicago in the early 1900s. She is studying the population changes and the activities t
AlexFokin [52]

Answer

Social school

Explanation

A historian is a person who does the study of the past and writes about them.He/she is normally  concerned with continuous,, methodical narrative and research of past events as relating to the human race; as well as the study of all history in time. A historian is involved in  various  studies which include economic  cultural ,social  and political studies.

Social means relating to society  and the way societies are organised based on the their day life effects which include unemployment, low salaries, and other social problems and other things like population changes and the activities that people do in their everyday lives.In social life it is how people or individuals interrelate with the surroundings.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
you are traveling to the heart of the arabian peninsula which of the following should you most likely bring
spin [16.1K]
Light clothing would be good also some sunglasses 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A person with conservative views believes that government should have a
dolphi86 [110]
A person with conservative views believes that government should have a <span>strong role in people's daily lives and is more likely to support the Republican Party</span>. The answer to your question is C. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • When billy meets with his therapist, he makes statements showing that he likes to manipulate other people, is a good liar, and a
    6·1 answer
  • Tamara has $500 she is looking to save for a class trip. She wants to earn the most possible interest and will not need access t
    10·1 answer
  • Public policy refers to the sum of government’s goals and actions made in response to public opinion.
    7·1 answer
  • Jamaal has to make an important phone call. Unfortunately, his cell phone is not charged and he has to use his landline, which d
    10·2 answers
  • Which was NOT an economic or political cause of World War II?
    11·1 answer
  • According to Robert Peck, ego differentiation involves
    9·1 answer
  • A tx-tss.caltesting.org/interim/inbrowser/app.html?page=login&amp;test-lype=interim
    13·1 answer
  • What was the name of the slave who introduced Coptic Christianity to Ethiopia
    7·1 answer
  • .
    11·1 answer
  • What was the institutes of the christian religion? a. a clear set of beliefs for the new protestant church in switzerland. c. a
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!