Assuming Wally has the legal right to keep the dog, a possible private solution to this problem is that
"the current situation is efficient."
Efficiency is the capacity to abstain from squandering materials, vitality, endeavors, cash, and time in accomplishing something or in creating a coveted outcome. In a more broad sense, it is the capacity to do things well, effectively, and without waste. In more numerical or logical terms, it is a measure of the degree to which input is all around utilized for an expected assignment or capacity. It frequently particularly involves the capacity of a particular utilization of push to deliver a particular result with a base sum or amount of waste, cost, or superfluous exertion. Efficiency alludes to altogether different data sources and yields in various fields and businesses.
Answer:
c. Defense Exportability Programs
Explanation:
Foreign military sales falls under the categories of Defense Exportability Program due to the fact that, it involves the transfer of military hardwares and softwares between two or more countries.
Before such trade can take place, there must be series of agreement between the countries and series of approval to be gotten from the agencies in-charge of military hardwares sales in-order to ensure due diligence was carried out.
<span>Article 1, Section 10 of the US Constitution grants more power to the federal government by limiting the states in several specific ways. States are limited in terms of the contracts they may enter into with foreign states, in their ability to maintain a currency, in the trade relations they may enter into with foreign states, and in their ability to enter into independent military alliances with foreign states.</span>
Protect and provide
The concept of government as provider comes next: government as provider of goods and services that individuals cannot provide individually for themselves. Government in this conception is the solution to collective action problems, the medium through which citizens create public goods that benefit everyone, but that are also subject to free-rider problems without some collective compulsion.
The basic economic infrastructure of human connectivity falls into this category: the means of physical travel, such as roads, bridges and ports of all kinds, and increasingly the means of virtual travel, such as broadband. All of this infrastructure can be, and typically initially is, provided by private entrepreneurs who see an opportunity to build a road, say, and charge users a toll, but the capital necessary is so great and the public benefit so obvious that ultimately the government takes over.
A more expansive concept of government as provider is the social welfare state: government can cushion the inability of citizens to provide for themselves, particularly in the vulnerable conditions of youth, old age, sickness, disability and unemployment due to economic forces beyond their control. As the welfare state has evolved, its critics have come to see it more as a protector from the harsh results of capitalism, or perhaps as a means of protecting the wealthy from the political rage of the dispossessed. At its best, however, it is providing an infrastructure of care to enable citizens to flourish socially and economically in the same way that an infrastructure of competition does. It provides a social security that enables citizens to create their own economic security.
The future of government builds on these foundations of protecting and providing. Government will continue to protect citizens from violence and from the worst vicissitudes of life. Government will continue to provide public goods, at a level necessary to ensure a globally competitive economy and a well-functioning society. But wherever possible, government should invest in citizen capabilities to enable them to provide for themselves in rapidly and continually changing circumstances.
Not surprisingly, this vision of government as investor comes from a deeply entrepreneurial culture. Technology reporter Gregory Ferenstein has polled leading silicon Valley entrepreneurs and concludedthat they “want the government to be an investor in citizens, rather than as a protector from capitalism. They want the government to heavily fund education, encourage more active citizenship, pursue binding international trade alliances and open borders to all immigrants.” In the words of Alphabet Chairman Eric Schmidt: “The combination of innovation, empowerment and creativity will be our solution.”
This celebration of human capacity is a welcome antidote to widespread pessimism about the capacity of government to meet current national and global economic, security, demographic and environmental challenges. Put into practice, however, government as investor will mean more than simply funding schools and opening borders. If government is to assume that in the main citizens can solve themselves more efficiently and effectively than government can provide for them, it will have to invest not only in the cultivation of citizen capabilities, but also in the provision of the resources and infrastructure to allow citizens to succeed at scale
