One advantage would be fertility
Well to begin with this process is called genetic engineering, the scientists altered the DNA of the chickens instead of altering a protein already in the chickens because when you alter the DNA the offsprings of the chicken will will have the same qualities while if you only alter the protein already in that chicken only that chicken will be able to do the job
The correct answer is C. Here's why:
Choice A is illogical. A single experiment does not confirm a theory as true. Multiple successful trials are needed for one to even consider a hypothesis to be accepted as a theory.
Choice B is wrong. If a scientist finds a new way to test a hypothesis, experimental methods do change. Note that when there are additional ways to test a hypothesis, a scientist should test it with additional methods.
Choice D is incorrect. If someone finds a way to test a new hypothesis, it would not be made into law since there is more information regarding the theory. This means that it would remain a theory until one can prove that it can't be tested using different methods.
I think the answer is 90%. According to the recent National institute of Health, Microbes in the human body estimates that 90% of the cells in human body are bacterial, fungal, or otherwise non-human. Despite the arguments that bacteria enjoys a commensal relationship with the humans hosts, only a fraction of the human microbia has been characterized.
Answer:
properties cell membranes
