Answer:
The answer is: She used the justice approach, realizing that the greater good is served because people learn to help each other in their own interest.
Explanation:
Justice approach: an ethical decision is a decision that distributes benefits and costs (or punishments) among those involved in a fair, equitable, and impartial way.
Paula used this approach because she believed the agents had acted improperly and that they were harming the US Secret Service.
I consider any organization a team, so in order for it to work well its members must be respected both by their peers and by the other teams´ members. If you consider the various types of activities this specific agency carries out, other not so friendly "teams" (other secret services or even terrorists) could use this type of information to damage or compromise those activities. So the well being of all the country was being jeopardized by a group of bad agents.
Answer:
1.) The internal controls which were missing are from the separation of responsibilities. There must have been in place an inner regulator were an individual works with advisers while alternative individual or unit take-care of the expense procedure, then somebody else allow expenses and then office should distribute the expenditures. There is an absence of inner controls as you can realize that the corporation amalgamated with a larger corporation and no one measured other accounts such as Jackson and company any longer.
2.) With the lack of control, this offered Helen the chance to effect the fraud. With this presence said, she was talented to emulate sign receipts and spend the retailer’s expenditures. She were also the one in responsibility of office the initial and final of accounts. In short, she had several accountabilities that should have remained separated up better and had diverse individuals for the separations of the job. In addition, she needed a bank description from the corporation where she was capable to put the expenditures and pay individual expenditures.
3.) The method this fraud might be noticed is the inspection squad can ask the bank for reports. They might also conference sellers. The accounting section should have ended sure they were doing the due diligence in dealers and corresponding the receipts with statements and expenditures.
Answer:
The answer is: Gross profit = $2,788
Explanation:
- Feb. 1 Purchase 110 units $46 per unit
- March 14 Purchase 190 units $48 per unit
- May 1 Purchase 135 units $ 50 per unit
312 units were sold at $64 per unit, tax rate is 30%
Using FIFO, what is the company's gross profit? We first calculate COGS
Cost of goods sold - 312 units:
- 110 units at $46 per unit = $5,060
- 190 units at $48 per unit = $9,120
- 60 units at $50 per unit = $3,000
Total COGS = $17,180
<u>Income statement for Hogan Industries 2017</u>
Total revenue $19,968
<u>COGS ($17,180) </u>
Gross profit $2,788
<u>Taxes 30% ($836.40) </u>
Net profit $1,951.60
Answer:
B). Contributory negligence
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about Merv Grazinski, who is driving his Winnebago, put it on cruise control to go make coffee. The Winnebago went off the road, turned over several times, and left Grazinski paralyzed from the waist down. He brings a product liability lawsuit against Winnebago. In this case, the best possible defense for Winnebago to use at trial Contributory negligence. Contributory negligence can be regarded as failure of plaintiff to have a tangible care for their own safety. Plantiff compensation could be reduced by Contributory negligence if confirmed that the occurrence of incident is likely as a result of their actions
its not a problem up there i don't see one nor the upload
