Ugh I hate these... Inverse property of multiplication.
I may be wrong but I hope I am not. But one expression is 16 × .15 and another is 16 × 15/100. When multiplying percentages you have to move the decimal that is invisbly behind the last number, two places to the left. The answer you get is the percentage of the price. You would then take the answer and add it to the price. The answer to the multiplication problem is 2.40. You then add the 2.40 to the $16 and that's the new price.
Answer:
what is the change in tomorrow morning but will be there at about human variation
It might be f but I’m getting a positive 6 instead of a negative
Answer:
z(s) is in the rejection region. We reject H₀. We dont have enought evidence to support that the cream has effect over the recovery time
Step-by-step explanation:
Sample information:
Size n = 100
mean x = 28,5
Population information
μ₀ = 30
Standard deviation σ = 8
Test Hypothesis
Null Hypothesis H₀ x = μ₀
Alternative Hypothesis Hₐ x < μ₀
We assume CI = 95 % then α = 5 % α = 0,05
As the alternative hypothesis suggest we should develop a one tail-test on the left ( we need to find out if the cream have any effect on the rash), effects on the rash could be measured as days of recovery
A z(c) for 0,05 from z-table is: z(c) = - 1,64
z(s) = ( x - μ₀ ) / σ/√n
z(s) = ( 28,5 - 30 ) / 8/√100
z(s) = - 1,5 * 10 / 8
z(s) = - 1,875
Comparing z(s) and z(c)
|z(s)| < |z(c)| 1,875 > 1,64
z(s) is in the rejection region. We reject H₀. We dont have enought evidence to support that the cream has effect over the recovery time
