Nathanson claims that a great benefit of abolishing the death penalty would be that this would send a symbolic message that killing is not acceptable except in self-defense.
Self-defense is a measure to protect one's health and well-being from harm. Many jurisdictions allow the exercise of the right of self-defense as a legal justification for the use of force in times of danger.
To use force to protect oneself from attempts to harm another person. If justified, self-defense is the defense against various crimes and unlawful acts involving violence such as murder, assault, and assault. criminal law.
Whether or not you have a pistol or other personal protective equipment, the goal of self-defense is to survive without injury and escape by deterring or stopping aggressive behavior.
Learn more about self-defense here:brainly.com/question/20714799
#SPJ4
<span>Jean-auguste-dominique ingress portrayal of the woman in grande odalisque DISTORTS her body
</span>The Grande Odalisque painted a woman from her back. In the painting, the woman is lying sideways on top of a bad as she look over toward the painter over her shoulder.
I believe it's the Connection versus independence.....
The answer to your question is true
It depends on how you use it. If an individual is using a cellphone for his/her entertainment even though the professor/teacher is having a lecture, then it is unethical. But if the individual is using his/her own phone for an emergency matter then it should be considered.
