1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zysi [14]
2 years ago
11

In your opinion, are the modern US Constitution and the New York Constitution of 1777 more alike or more different? Explain your

answer in about 75 to 100 words. Support your answer with evidence and list any outside sources you use.
History
1 answer:
oksano4ka [1.4K]2 years ago
7 0

The main difference however between the modern US Constitution and the New York Constitution of 1777 is that while the US Constitution allows for various powers to the legislative branch, the New York Constitution tend to restrict legislative powers.

<h3>What are the similarities between the modern US Constitution and the New York Constitution of 1777?</h3>

These include:

  • Freedom of worship,
  • religious liberty,
  • freedom of speech,  
  • the right to assembly

The New York Bill of Rights contains some key elements of the United States Constitution and this shows the individual rights and liberties which shows the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution.

Read more about US Constitution here:

brainly.com/question/453546

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
What issues regarding the newly established national government did the document not resolve?
Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer:

The weaknesses of this system led states to call for a new Constitution. ... The Articles established a weak central government and placed most powers in the ... they neglected to make it powerful enough to solve the issues facing a new nation. ... One of the biggest problems was that the national government had no power

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How did curly bill (william brocius) affect the westward expansion​
RoseWind [281]

Answer:

William B. “Curly Bill” Brocius (or Brocious) was an outlaw leader of the Clanton Gang of Arizona

William Brocius (c. 1845 – March 24, 1882) had a number of conflicts with the lawmen of the Earp family, and he was named as one of the individuals who participated in Morgan Earp's assassination. Deputy U.S. Marshal Wyatt Earp and a group of deputies including his brother Warren Earp pursued those they believed responsible for Morgan's death. The Earp posse unexpectedly encountered Curly Bill and other Cowboys on March 24, 1882, at Iron Springs(present day Mescal Springs). Wyatt killed Curly Bill during the shoot out. In his journal written in October 1881, George Parsons referred to Brocius as "Arizona's most famous outlaw

Explanation:

Brocius is thought to have been born in 1845 and arrived in Arizona Territory from either Texas or Missouri in about 1878, bringing a herd of cattle to the San Carlos Reservation. Afterward, he made his way to Tombstone, Arizona where he was a vicious, drunken gunman, cattle rustler, and murderer.

In October of 1880, he shot Tombstone’s first marshal, Fred White when the marshal attempted to disarm him. Charged with the murder, Brocius was later acquitted by a jury as an accidental death.

In July of 1881, Curly Bill, along with Johnny Ringo, killed William and Isaac Haslett in Hauchita, New Mexico in revenge for the deaths of Clanton members Bill Leonard and Harry Head who had attempted to rob the Haslett brothers general store some weeks earlier. A few weeks later, Brocious led an ambush attacking a group of Mexicans in the San Luis Pass, killing six of them and torturing the remaining eight.

After the death of “Old Man” Newton Clanton in another ambush in Guadelupe Canyon in July, Curly Bill became the leader of the Clanton Gang. After the Gunfight at the O.K. Corral in October 1881, Brocius attempted to kill Virgil Earp and succeeded in assassinating Morgan Earp. Brother Wyatt, looking for revenge for Morgan’s killing, reportedly caught up with Brocius on March 24, 1882, and killed him with a double shotgun blast to the chest. This account; however, was reported by Wyatt Earp himself and many historians doubt the fact as Earp was known to have exaggerated some accounts.

4 0
3 years ago
What is one common criticism of both monopolies and oligopolies?
kolezko [41]

Answer:

The answer is c

6 0
3 years ago
Early in our history, problems of old age were considered to be:
harina [27]
Early in our history, problems of old age were considered to be: personal problems
7 0
3 years ago
How did immigration change the American experience? Would industrialization
Marta_Voda [28]

The US has typically benefited greatly from immigration. The most notable citizens of the US often came to the country as immigrants or first-generation citizens. In order to create a very open and happy culture that encouraged independence and ambition, we combined elements of the British core culture with the Nordic work ethic and values, the Irish mischief and love of the underdog, the Italian and Spanish influences, as well as those of the African, Chinese, and Mexican immigrants.

However, there have been instances when having too many immigrants has seriously affected the US. It has sparked several recessions and deflations. For instance, a rush of immigrants starting in the 1870s outpaced our ability to assimilate them, contributing significantly to the slump of 1890. Even worse, people were congregating in ethnic ghettos, which was seriously harming the country and destroying the pay scale, leading to an almost complete economic collapse. Similar trends are being observed with the influx of refugees and illegal immigrants into the US. Our economy is being destroyed by a lack of integration, ethnic ghettos, and labor excess, and national unity is hanging by a thread as a result.

Westward Expansion undoubtedly had something to do with immigration. At that time, the nation was experiencing a massive influx of immigration, which essentially compelled an expansion in order to provide immigrants and settlers with sufficient housing. I think the Westward Expansion would have taken place whether there had been an inflow of immigrants or not. Immigration made a significant contribution to the economy's and society's variety. The trading environment will undergo a significant transformation during this time due to the new skill sets that were coming from varied ethnicities. Without immigration, Westward Expansion certainly would have been conceivable. Earlier than immigration began to rise, colonists and settlers were already relocating west.

Thank you,

Eddie

3 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Use the library, encyclopedia, and Internet to research and then write a 750 word report on one of the following topics: Ninetee
    6·1 answer
  • Compare/contrast the economy of the new england and mid-atlantic colonies
    7·1 answer
  • If you live in a place where the sun never sets for weeks at a time, where do you live and what time of year is it?
    10·1 answer
  • Marx and Engels Thought that all history was the history of class struggles. They believed that ______.
    7·2 answers
  • What evidence did dalton use to argue for the existence of atoms?
    9·1 answer
  • The great economic and social divisions between the North and South in the first half of the 1800s eventually led to the Civil W
    11·1 answer
  • In the period from 1200 to 1450 CE, trans-Saharan trade networks influenced state formation in West Africa.
    6·2 answers
  • This painting is considered to be
    12·1 answer
  • 1) why did England have an "unfavorable balance of trade" with China?
    9·1 answer
  • Who was the first usa president
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!