Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
The correct answer is obviously, You recognized that it exists, i have no idea what they were smoking when they wrote this question.
Answer:
<u><em></em></u>
Explanation:
By definition the<em> atomic number </em>of an element is the<em> number of protons.</em>
The protons are the positevely charged particles in the nucleus of the atom.
The atomic number of an element is what uniquely identifies it. There are 118 known elements and all of them are represented in the periodic table. Then, there are 118 different atomic numbers.
The elements are arranged in the periodic table in increasing order ot atomic number.
For instance:
- The element with <em>atomic number</em> 1 is hydrogen (H). It is the first element in the periodic table, located in the upper left corner of the table. It has one <em>proton</em>. NONE other element has just one proton.
- The element with <em>atomic number</em> 2 is helium (He). It has two <em>protons</em>, is located at the upper right corner of the periodic table and NONE other element has just two protons.
- The element with <em>atomic number</em> 118 is Oganesson (Og). It is the last element in the periodic table. It is located in the bottom right corner of the periodic table. It has 118 <em>protons</em> and NONE other element has atomic number 118.
Fair test can help you avoid wrong answers as they are used in finding right answers in research.
<h3>What is fair test?</h3>
Fair test is used to investigate in research, the researcher keeps some variable as constant while other are changed and not constant to get effective answers. Fair test can be used to generate accurate answers in research.
Therefore, fair test can help you avoid wrong answers as they are used in finding right answers in research.
Learn more on fair test below,
brainly.com/question/6791607
#SPJ11
