Disclosure versus anonymity is a critical issue that can be described as expecting group participants to make the choice to relinquish some of their controlled and rehearsed ways and allow themselves to respond more spontaneously to events of the moment.
Anonymity According to Marx (1999), anonymity represents a state in which a person cannot be identified. It is social in nature and requires "at least one audience" (p.100). Not surprisingly, there was much debate about its role in communication.
For example, anonymity has long been associated with personalization effects that can lead to uncontrollable behavior (Jessup, Connolly, & Garegher, 1990; Zimbardo, 1969). It is also associated with certain prosocial behaviors (Johnson & Downing, 1979; Zimbardo, 1969).
CMC is not the only means of communication that allows anonymity, but traditional forms of communication such as letters and telephones can also avoid identity verification. With computer technology, anonymity separates people in time and space.
Learn more about Disclosure versus anonymity here: brainly.com/question/1382377
#SPJ4
