Answer:
1. They had a lot of destructive weapons, and to prevent things like in World War 2, they decided to take action to defeat them.
2. The UK prime minister at the time agreed with America, they decided to take action. The prime minister said this:"To disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people."
Credits: Wikipedia
Explanation:
Answer:
The missing options are:
A. Potential confounding variables are not always controlled din laboratory studies
.
B. Retention tests employed in laboratory studies are usually once merged with factual information rather than emotions
.
C. The intensity of emotional responses is more accurately measured after the event in laboratory studies
.
D. Memories and emotional experiences as in real life are very different from those generated in laboratory studies.
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
Generalizability measures how useful is what scientists have been studying in a laboratory in comparison with the real-life since the first option is a prototype of reality that can miss valuable variables that can have an impact on the real life. With generalizability, we can see if the results of the investigation and the process that scientists used are useful in real life and can apply to other things or communities. The efficiency of generalizability depends on how well the representation of reality was in the laboratory.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
They are all true to one degree or another except D. The worst of them is contained
<em>in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.</em>
<em />
In other words, the worst crime of all was the fact that the British Government had established George III as an undemocratic unapproachable Lord and Master over the colonies, and the Declaration liked that least of all.
I believe the answer is: valid, but not reliable
A result would be considered as valid if it is created by using proper logical thought or common way of reasoning. But, such result on personality would not be considered to be reliable because there are too many factors that could create a deviation within the data, and there is no accurate way to truly measure personality.
Answer:
A hypothesis or model is called falsifiable if it is possible to conceive of an experimental observation that disproves the idea in question. That is, one of the possible outcomes of the designed experiment must be an answer, that if obtained, would disprove the hypothesis.
