Answer:
Equity Theory.
Explanation:
As Peter offers his manager some suggestions for a new holiday display. His manager shrugs his shoulders and tells Peter that the display is all set. Then Sarah approaches the manager with an idea for the display, and the manager tells her that it’s a great idea. Equity theory is the model of motivation that explains how Peter is striving for fairness and justice. Equity theory explains that employees should be treated equally and fairly in order to keep them motivated at the workplace. If employees started feeling that they not being treated fairly then they will dissatisfied and demotivated at the workplace which will definitely reduces their work productivity. Human beings are motivated when they are treated fairly and equally.
Answer:
Structure team discussions to focus on a smaller set of key issues.
Explanation:
The best way to get outcome from the team is to set structure team discussions so they can focus on key issues and any ambiguity or issues can be resolved with an outcome as a team.
Answer:
low ball
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed about A dealer who persuades a customer to buy a new car by reducing the price to well below that of his competitors. Once the customer has agreed to buy the car, the terms of the sale are shifted by lowering the value of the trade-in and requiring the purchase of expensive extra equipment. Now the car costs well above the current market rate. In this case, This is an example of the low ball procedure. The low-balling procedure can be regarded as lpersuasion tactic whereby the seller offer will give an initial offer of goods/ service at a lower price than the expected price, so that the buyer can commit, after the commitment from buyer, the price will be suddenly increased. This technique is famous among salesmen as well as advertisers.
Answer:
Answer explained
Explanation:
The case is about the defamation claimed by plaintiff on the defendant on the basis of race remark of g a y or bisexual by third party information. This ultimately broken the relationship of two person.
I think that court should ultimately found that the accusations of homosexuality or bisexuality amounted to defamation per se because of the following reason:
- The Race Remark on the plaintiff by the defendant.
- It is a slander per se.
- This remark impute to the commission of the crime of sodomy.
- It is implying Unchastity that means Exposing Plaintiff to Public Hatred. This spoils the life of the plaintiff.
Answer:rr56iomivt
Explanation:
gi'opi[9[hjkjgkglo8uhuoouhiii6666666699999999999999999
