Answer:
<u>Budgeted functional income statement for 2015</u>
Gross sales ($2,000,000 × 1.04 × 1.06) $2,204,800
Less: Estimated uncollectible accounts ($2,204,800 × 2 %) ($44,096)
Net sales $2,160,704
Cost of goods sold (1,100,000 × 1.03) ($1,133,000)
Gross profit $1,027,704
Operating expenses (475,000 × 1.10) ($522,500)
Depreciation ($25,000)
Net income $480,204
Explanation:
Make the adjustments stated on the 2014 Income Statement.
For Operating Expenses, it is wise to first remove the depreciation expense and apply the increment of 10% to reflect Operating Costs for 2015.
Treat Depreciation Expense separately and at the same amount as for 2014, since depreciation is calculated on straight line method.
Opportunity cost is the value of your second choice, or whatever you give up to get something
Taylor gives up either the video games or the funny videos. So you can choose either one
Answer:
The differences between US GAAP and IFRS pose an extra cost because international corporations must prepare two separate accounting statements. But besides that, other potential risks include paying higher taxes than what the companies should pay int their home countries and the uncertainty generated by changing rules.
Not only do current tax rates affect potential investments, e.g. currently companies in the US pay relatively low corporate taxes (Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017) but these benefits end on 2025. But also different methods for valuating physical assets and R&D costs can represent higher than expected taxes. E.g. depending on a company's needs, it may be beneficial to expense all R&D costs right away, or maybe it would be better to capitalize some of them after technical feasibility is achieved (IFRS).
The main advantage of having uniform rules (e.g. UCC) is that all the companies know exactly what to expect and how to act. Certainty decreases risk, and less risk reduces costs.
Explanation:
In the US, the vast majority of firms use US GAAP as their accounting method, but around the world the IFRS method is used.
Physical asset valuation is the process of determining the value of your physical assets including P, P & E, and also inventories.
- When valuing inventories IFRS uses FIFO, while US GAAP allows FIFO, LIFO or weighted average costing methods. US GAAP also values inventory at lesser of cost or market value, while IFRS values inventory at lesser of cost or net realizable value.
- US GAAP uses the cost method to determine the historic cost of an asset, while IFRS uses basically the same method but does not include all the costs of location of the assets (e.g. cost of removing or clearing a facility).
- US GAAP recognizes non-monetary exchanges while IFRS doesn't.
- IFRS also allows the cost of asset to be revalued, which can result in unrealized gains or losses. The US GAAP only considers historic costs.
- There are also other minor differences regarding depreciation, disposals and impairment rules.
Research and development must be expensed right away under US GAAP, while IFRS basically requires the same, it allows some capitalization of development expenditures if certain criteria is met (technical feasibility is achieved).
Answer:
The $200,000 represents the revenue and the $50,000 represents the profit.
Explanation:
