The description of "Ideology and Nationalism on the Eve of the American Revolution: Revisions Once More in Need of Revising" is shown below.
<h3>Ideology and Nationalism on the Eve of the American Revolution: Revisions Once More in Need of Revising -</h3>
This essay was inspired by an influential piece written by Edmund S. Morgan over forty years ago.
"Ideology and Nationalism on the Eve of the American Revolution: Revisions Needed Again" may be categorized as a "thought piece," reflecting on the current status of eighteenth-century Anglo-American historiography.
Morgan's findings, like those advanced here, were intended to be speculative in nature, with the objective of stimulating constructive debate regarding key interpretive concerns.
In such spirit, he addressed familiar themes and challenged existing orthodoxies, speculating on how writers writing about colonial society on the verge of National Independence may push the subject in fruitful new ways.
Therefore, the description of "Ideology and Nationalism on the Eve of the American Revolution: Revisions Once More in Need of Revising" is shown.
The correct answer to the following question will be "sit-in".
Explanation:
The Warren Court greatly extended civil rights or liberties, judiciary as well as federal authority, it backed sit-in, finding that slaves who attempted to leave a separate lunch counter should never be taken to court.
The Court adopted the per individual concept, a single vote, which indicated that legislatures needed to always be re-assigned based on population.
