Answer:
in both cases the flyer was presented to the barber before the service was provided.
a) no, because Karl was informed about the mistake and the real price and could then still have decided to take his business elsewhere. but if he then agreed to still have the service performed under the now updated conditions, then that is what the "contract" is basing on.
he has no grounds to claim the other price afterwards.
b) no, because the service provider saw the flyer information, did not object to or correct the information right away, but performed the service instead. now the "contract" is based on that agreement based on the conditions of the flyer.
Answer and Explanation:
A. Because plagiarism is a crime and contradicts an attorney's moral and ethical code. This takes away all the credibility of the lawyer, shows that he is not able to hold the position, in addition to showing that he acts in criminal activities of high gravity and therefore must be punished immediately and have his profession questioned.
B. The Iowa court referred to other cases involving plagiarism, which is the practice that allows someone else's works and words to be copied without due credit. Cases of plagiarism are very common and the Iowa court must treat everyone with the same severity in order for them to be fought.
Desk will be far from each other you would need lots of hand sanitizer and their will be new rules hanged up on walls education will not be affected hard because you probably would not have time to talk about that but you will definitely have new rules
