Answer:
People whn hear the word crime thy r scared especially rich people because thy have many thgs so i think in 18th century the crime of stealing was da most because people were unemployed and wanted food to eat so thy would steal from rich people
Answer:
The officials should research the crime area and they should also get the statements from the person who killed. Until all the investigation is completed, they should treat the person as neither criminal nor victim. ... In principles of Ubuntu, a victim should be treated with broad humanity and ethics.
Answer:
you should paraphrase
Explanation:
Before the Bill of Rights, people could be suspected and accused of a crime without determining whether is was true. Not everyone had a right to a trial where they could defend themselves or be defended by a lawyer before they were punished. The Bill of Rights has influenced the coined phrase "Innocent until proven guilty." It also allows people who believe their trial was unfair to request a new one so they can be fairly judged.
It depends on how long ago that they made that poor decision. It also depends on if the victim holds a grudge or not, once is likely. So honestly it depends. But, in some States and/or Countries, Schools and Work forbidden Cyberbullying. So in that case, they may or may not accept the fate that the bully has threatened.
Although this may be confusing to take in, I’d say that yes, they should be held accountable, until they learn the fate they have crossed online.
Answer:
Ethics are static
Explanation:
Ethics may change due to experiences that happen later in life or by other influences.
