1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
icang [17]
1 year ago
15

Which of the following is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading?

Law
1 answer:
fgiga [73]1 year ago
5 0

The statement that is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading is: The school district can choose to disregard claims without merit.

What is protocol?

Protocol can be defined as a set of guideline or policy that is expected of a person or an individual to follow or abide by.

Since parents or students have the right to ask that a school correct education records in which they tend to believe to be inaccurate or misleading.  The school district can choose to disregard claims without merit is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading.

Learn more about protocol here:brainly.com/question/5660386

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
How much do parents have to pay for their child to be inside juvenile detention centers
QveST [7]

Answer:

my parents had to pay upwards to 36,000 when i went there

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
BRAINLIEST + 15 POINTS FOR CORRECT ANSWER
nekit [7.7K]

Answer:

she should discuss options with the airport since she is only a pilot and the airport authorities should decide on the choices

5 0
2 years ago
What is a contract that has been concluded as a result of undue influence<br> ​
Lady bird [3.3K]

Explanation:

A contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other.

3 0
2 years ago
Mapp v. Ohio Case: Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer.
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment.  Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."

8 0
2 years ago
Question 13
ivanzaharov [21]

If I remember correctly, your license gets revoked for 30 days

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following guidelines are in the Code of Fair Information Practices (check all that apply).
    8·1 answer
  • The president appoints a new head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) after the former head retired - in which role is
    9·1 answer
  • when exiting the expressway, the de acceleration lane may be short, requiring you to _____________ quickly
    8·1 answer
  • A federal statute designed to stop organized crime enumerated certain activities as crimes and provided that, in addition to cha
    13·1 answer
  • What are taxes ? And why do you need to pay them ?
    8·2 answers
  • Status offenses are a second classification of youthful offender also known as wayward minors. A status offender is a child subj
    12·1 answer
  • Assume that you are planning to start your own day care center. You will need to consider many aspects, such as legal, technical
    5·2 answers
  • Looking at the response vehicles (pictured above), explain two options you have in order to abide by the Move Over law.
    5·1 answer
  • The house agreed to the compromise as soon as the senate approved it
    15·1 answer
  • A resident was restrained after refusing to take his medication. What right is being violated?.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!