I’m doing this too hopefully someone answers quick cause I’m confused also.
Thank you, I appreciate the warning.
Answer:
Hsu was indicted for violating the Economic Espio- nage Act by conspiring to steal corporate trade secrets for an anti-cancer drug. The defense requested a copy of the trade secret documents. The government contended that the defense did not need access to the documents except under supervision of the judge. The defense maintained a right of full access to the documents so the defense of impossibil- ity could be established, meaning Hsu could not steal trade secrets that did not exist. District court agreed with the defense; government appealed. Must the defendant be allowed full access to trade secrets that are a key part of a case? [U.S. v. Hsu, 155 F. 3d 189, 3rd Cir. (1998)]
Explanation:
Answer:
False
Explanation:
It is not Title VIII of the 1972 Education Act that prohibits gender discrimination in all primary and secondary schools, colleges and universities that receive federal funds. Title IX determines this.
This title aims to promote gender equality throughout the country's education sector, allowing girls and boys to have the same chances and the same privileges in all phases of academic growth, not allowing one gender to be valued above the other.
