All categories

2 years ago

H e l p pleaseeee is due in 30 min

Law

1 answer:

FinnZ [79.3K]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

In this case, the Supreme Court has to rule against Niskayuna High School. The reason for this is because the high school did not respect Goode's beliefs and practices when it came to religion. According to the summary, Goode had lost a Harvard scholarship just because of practicing religion. The high school does not have the right to take anything away from the student; therefore, the Supreme Court has to force the Highschool to pay for Goode's Harvard tuition. Also the court has to take into consideration the fact that the school violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendent, because every person in this world has to have the right to practice any religion as desired.

You might be interested in

Do you agree or disagree that the state should build roads with the help of federal funds? Is it fair for all states to give mon

vivado [14]

Answer:

Yes I agree and yes it is fair to give money to another state to build roads because it decrease power centralisation and promotes unity in action.

Explanation:

This directly relates to the system of checks and balances.
It is the system designed to reduce the effects of centralisation of power by ensuring that no single authority has complete control over decisions and promotes cooperation.
For Example: The tripartite system practiced in different countries where judicial, legislative and executive aspects of government has equal authorities in amending or removing the law.
In regard to projects like building roads other states can cooperate with one state to improve its infrastructure for equitable development.

5 0

3 years ago

In which case did the Supreme Court state that a seizure has occurred if the officer's conduct in conjunction with the questioni

german

Answer:

terry v. ohio

Explanation:

Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

7 0

3 years ago

The policy framework and guidelines for community policing state that you should consider 13 interrelated elements to understand

Lubov Fominskaja [6]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no references or context attached, we can comment on the following.

The 13 interrelated elements to understand community policing are:

Foot Patrol. Policemen patrol every street in the assigned zone.

Vehicle patrol. Police using vehicles to speed patrol.

Citizens patrol. Members of the community volunteering.

Case screening. To assign cases to proper detectives.

Situational Crime Prevention. Police making statements to create consciousness about crime and its consequences.

Community Crime Prevention. Police work closely with the community to prevent crime.

Prevention of crime in youth people. Police create programs to help youngsters.

Geographic approach. To signal the most conflictive areas.

Implementation of the SARA process. This menas Scanning, Analysis, Response, Assessment.

Multi-Agency Teams. A multidisciplinary approach to policing.

Communication. Open lines of communication with citizens.

Intelligence work. To gather proper information that helps prevent crime.

Crime Analysis. To better understand the behavior of criminals and the way they proceed.

6 0

2 years ago

Please write a paragraph describing your opinion on Natural Law and Legal Positivism.

evablogger [386]

The positivist thesis does not say that law’s merits are unintelligible, unimportant, or peripheral to the philosophy of law. It says that they do not determine whether laws or legal systems exist. Whether a society has a legal system depends on the presence of certain structures of governance, not on the extent to which it satisfies ideals of justice, democracy, or the rule of law. What laws are in force in that system depends on what social standards its officials recognize as authoritative; for example, legislative enactments, judicial decisions, or social customs. The fact that a policy would be just, wise, efficient, or prudent is never sufficient reason for thinking that it is actually the law, and the fact that it is unjust, unwise, inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient reason for doubting it. According to positivism, law is a matter of what has been posited (ordered, decided, practiced, tolerated, etc.). Austin thought the thesis “simple and glaring”. While it is probably the dominant view among analytically inclined philosophers of law, it is also the subject of competing interpretations together with persistent criticisms and misunderstandings.

7 0

2 years ago

pls help me asap forensic science!!!!! What are three types of finger prints found in the human population? How often does each

DIA [1.3K]

1). arch 70% of time

2) loops 60% of time

3). whirls rare, less than 40% of time

7 0

2 years ago