Answer:
The work of both is similar but the levels of legal authority are different and unequal
Explanation:
Took the quiz on edge
Answer: True
Explanation:
You just need to use critical thinking on this, follow me and give me points pls
1. Richard Clarke does not have a point when he discussed breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments because what this achieves is increased departmentalization.
2. I would not split the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments. Rather, I would split the department into operational units to manage the various threats that the United States faces while keeping the department as one.
<h3>What are the goals of the Department of Homeland Security?</h3>
The Department of Homeland Security, created after the 9/11 attacks, to strengthen the security architecture of the nation at home, has the responsibility to pursue the following security goals:
- Prevent terrorism
- Enhance security
- Secure and manage U.S. borders
- Enforce and administer U.S. immigration laws.
Under these broad goals, the Department of Homeland Security oversees the national security of the United States from numerous threats.
Some of the direct responsibilities of the Department of Homeland Security include:
- Border security
- Aviation security
- Countering terrorism
- Emergency response
- Chemical facility inspection
- IT and cybersecurity security
- Natural disaster planning and response.
Thus, instead of discussing splitting the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments, Richard Clarke should look at ways to strengthen and empower the department to achieve its goals.
Learn more about the Department of Homeland Security at brainly.com/question/19521614
#SPJ1
Answer:
B. Of organizational life according to which even democratic organizations will become bureaucracies ruled by a few individuals.
Explanation:
The "iron law of oligarchy" notes that all types of organization must gradually and inevitably develop oligarchic tendencies, regardless of how democratic they may be at the outset, rendering true democracy actually and theoretically impossible, particularly in large groups and complex organisations, it is an Organizational theory in which even a democratic entity inevitably evolves into a bureaucracy dominated by a few individuals.
The "iron law of oligarchy " reflects that if a democratic organisation, then a non-democratic organisation, will never be fully democratic.
