Before the developement of new criticism and formalism, what was a common approach to interpretting literature?

1 answer:

6 0

Before the development of new criticism and formalism, the common approach to interpreting literature was traditional literary criticism.

Traditional Literary criticism was used before the development of formalism and new criticism to interpret literature. Traditional literary criticism focuses on the author's biographical information and how it influences the work.

This criticism ignores reader response and focuses upon the author, time period, and text alone. Traditional literary criticism places the text back into the period which it came from in order for the reader to better understand the intent of the author.

Hence, before the development of new criticism and formalism, the literature was was interpreted by traditional literary criticism.

To learn more about the traditional literary criticism here:

brainly.com/question/301493

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

The tendency to assume that one's culture and way of life are superior to all others is termed

Zigmanuir [339]

Hm, I think the question here calls for "d", although d would be better defined as a focus on one's own culture, and ignoring other cultures, or seeing other cultures through the lense of own culture.

In a way, prejudice could be a good lead, but only if it said "prejudice towards all other cultures" which is not really feasible (one can't know all other cultures).

so, still, d is best, although there can be ethnocentrism without feeling superior

3 0

3 years ago

What is the most likely reason why many of the New York Factory Investigating Commissionâ€™s suggestions were not implemented im

Lerok [7]

Answer:

Factory owners resisted the suggestions of the new York factory investigating commission because they would be costly to implement.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Fill in the two blanks in the following statement: According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the average globa

Artist 52 [7]

Answer:

1°c, 30 years.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Cosmides and Tooby tested participants' ability to solve variations of the Wason problem, including ones containing stories abou

ivann1987 [24]

Cosmides and Tooby tested participants' ability to solve variations of the Wason problem, including ones containing stories about a particular culture. Their results showed that <u>culture-specific knowledge</u> is not always necessary for conditional reasoning.

<u>Explanation:</u>

These tests conducted by Cosmides and Tooby contained the participant using their abilities and logical reasoning in order to solve various variations of the Wason Problem. While the problems had a cultural addition to them, where they may or may not contain stories about a particular culture.

This led to similar results though which showed Cosmides and Tooby that it was not necessary for the participants to have knowledge of the culture specifically to remember or know the stories. Thus, the more general approach and inductive processes were not culture specific and thus, needed no cultural knowledge as the process were distributed similarly throughout the cultures.

6 0

3 years ago

The authors of both documents write about the same event in different ways due to:lack of informationauthor biasthey are seconda

Dmitrij [34]

People frequently harbor a variety of biases. Due to author bias, the writers of the two texts present the same event in different ways.

An author who is prejudiced is simply one who, in some manner, did not pay attention to all the facts, or evidence, or build a logical case to support his or her opinions.

In this context, bias is simply defined as when a point or remark demonstrates partiality or preference for a person, thing, etc. When you suspect a source may be prejudiced, when the author's viewpoint is strongly held or skewed, etc., you can usually tell.

Prejudice is a synonym for bias, which means that the arguments used to justify a position are frequently irrational. To assess an argument's worth and validity impartially, the reader must be able to identify any author's prejudice.

To learn more about author bias

brainly.com/question/24460194

#SPJ4

4 0

1 year ago