1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ehidna [41]
2 years ago
6

An amoeba is much less complex than a fruit fly; however the amoeba has a much larger genome (c-value). What is the best overall

explanation for this paradox?
Biology
1 answer:
gayaneshka [121]2 years ago
8 0

The amoeba has a much larger genome (C-value) because A large percentage of eukaryotic genomes is non-coding DNA, the amoeba has much more non-coding DNA than the fruit fly.

  • The amount of DNA in an organism's haploid genome is measured by the C-value. It varies greatly, often rising in C-value as organism complexity increases—from prokaryotes to invertebrates, vertebrates, and plants.
  • The so-called C-Value Paradox refers to the finding that genome size does not always rise in proportion to an organism's apparent level of complexity.
  • In comparison to prokaryotes (organisms without a nucleus), such as bacteria, eukaryotes, or species having a nucleus to hold their genetic material (DNA), do have larger genomes.
  • Only 4 million base pairs make up the best friend of microbiologists, E. coli. On the other hand, the fly, Drosophila Melanogaster, has 140 million base pairs. Clearly, a fly is more complicated than a bacterium.

learn more about C-value here: brainly.com/question/13188599

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
How does global warming affect biodiversity?
Sophie [7]
Pretty sure it is B
6 0
3 years ago
Which graph is an exponential growth model?<br> A.<br> B.<br> C.
finlep [7]
C: from what I can see in the graph
7 0
3 years ago
Prokaryotes will take up foreign dna how is this characteristic used in genetic engineering
Charra [1.4K]
Pieces of genes can be inserted into the genetic material of prokaryotes so that they will make the protein products encoded in the genes or copies of the genes themselves
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Clarify the relationship between photosynthesis and cellular respiration
Liono4ka [1.6K]

Answer:

Photosynthesis converts carbon dioxide and water into oxygen and glucose. Glucose is used as food by the plant and oxygen is a by-product. Cellular respiration converts oxygen and glucose into water and carbon dioxide. Water and carbon dioxide are by- products and ATP is energy that is transformed from the process.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Leer el siguiente texto de las teorías evolutivas y expresar cuales son las principales semejanzas y diferencias
IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

Lamarck creía que la evolución era una consecuencia de la presión ambiental mientras que Darwin expresó que el mecanismo de evolución es la selección natural

Explanation:

Lamarck desarrolló una teoría en la que propuso que los organismos evolucionaban como una consecuencia de la influencia ambiental y que los cambios fenotípicos causados por el ambiente podía ser trasmitidos a través de generaciones. Por otra parte, Darwin desarrollo una teoría en la cual las especies evolucionan a través de un proceso que él denominó selección natural (supervivencia del más apto) : aquellos organismos mejor adaptados a su ambiente tendrán más chances de sobrevivir y de reproducirse, pasando sus genes a la siguiente generación. En relación al cuadro comparativo, Lamarck creía que las jirafas se adaptaban a su ambiente para sobrevivir, mientras que Darwin propuso que aquellas jirafas que mejor se adaptaban a un ambiente cambiante tenían más chances de sobrevivir. Lamarck también creía en la idea del uso y desuso de órganos: las jirafas con el tiempo podía desarrollar cuellos más largos estirándose para alcanzar las hojas de los árboles de copas más altas y transmitían esta característica a su progenie, mientras que Darwin propuso que aquellas jirafas con cuellos más largos tenían más chances de sobrevivir que las que tenían cuello corto (selección natural), y las jirafas de cuello largo transmitían este rasgo a su descendencia (descendencia con modificación). Lamarck creía en la idea que las especies no poseen un antecesor común, mientras  que Darwin creía que todo el árbol de la vida está conectado a través de antepasados comunes. Finalmente, Lamarck pensaba que las especies no podían extinguirse, mientras que Darwin propuso la idea que las especies se extinguen y surgen otras nuevas a través de procesos de radiación adaptativa.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which event is most likely to keep happening if deforestation continues on earth?
    11·1 answer
  • What color is the offspring of a purple and green flower?
    7·1 answer
  • How do organisms get their DNA?
    7·1 answer
  • A disadvantage of using hydroelectricity is select one it is nonrenewable it is a nonrenewable resource it can disturb natural e
    11·1 answer
  • Where is transcription located? (assuming eukaryote cell)
    14·1 answer
  • Endosymbiosis refers to the process in which prokaryotes live within eukaryote hosts. The endosymbiosis model of mitochondria an
    11·1 answer
  • The Mesozoic era was the "Age of Reptiles." At the end of the Mesozoic era, many groups of animals disappeared suddenly. Scienti
    13·1 answer
  • An 8-year-old girl has had difficulty swallowing for the past day. On examination, her pharynx is swollen and erythematous with
    11·1 answer
  • Forensic scientist Bennet asks his technician for the scalar quantity of fingerprints found at his crime scene. What would be th
    7·1 answer
  • What are the scientific importances of studying anatomical features of angiosperns​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!