Answer:
a. $45,600
b. $45,296
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. The proceed of the note is always equal to the face amount i.e $45,600
b. After considering the discounted rate, the proceed of the note is
= ($45,600) - ($45,600 × 8% × 30 days ÷ 360 days)
= $45,600 - $304
= $45,296
After considering the discount rate and the issuing days, the proceed of the note could come
Answer:
21.29%
Explanation:
The computation of the internal growth rate is shown below:
But before that we need to determine the following calculations
Debt equity ratio js
= debt ÷ equity
The debt is 0.6 of equity
So,
= 0.6 × $8,600
= $5,160
Now
Total assets = Total liabilities + Total equity
= $8,600 + $5,160
= $13,760
Return on assets = Net income ÷ Total assets
= $3450 ÷ $13760
= 0.2507
Now as we know that
Retention ratio = 1 - payout ratio
= 1 - 0.3
= 0.7
And, finally
The Internal growth rate is
= (Return on assets × Retention ratio) ÷ [1 - (Return on assets × Retention ratio)]
= (0.2507 × 0.7) ÷ [1 - (0.2507 × 0.7)]
= 21.29%
Answer:
Explanation:
Let's recall the formula that will be used for calculations
The annual payment on the loan=Present value of a loan/PVIFA
r=7%; n=5
Annual payment on the loan=71500/4.100197=17438.19
OR we can use the financial calculator and input the following data:
PV = 71500; r=7%; n=5; PMT=?
PMT=17438.19
Amortization schedule:
YEAR Beg. balance Total PMT Interest PMT Principal PMT End. Bal.
1 71500 17438.19 5005 12433.19 59066.81
2 59066.81 17438.19 4134.68 13303.51 45763.3
3 45763.30 17438.19 3203.43 14234.76 31528.54
4 31528.54 17438.19 2207 15231.19 16297.35
5 16297.35 17438.19 1140.81 16297.38 0
*5005 = 71500 ×0.07
12433.19=17438.19-5005 and so on...
Answer:
B) False
Explanation:
The chicken tactic is a combination of a huge deceit or bluff about what you really want or need, and a threat to do something usually not very normal or rational. The whole idea is to try to force the other negotiating party to chicken out and surrender to your requests. Both a chicken tactic and a hardball tactic are designed to take advantage of the other party.
The problem with using a chicken tactic is what happens if the other side calls the bluff, will the threat be real or not, and what position will the other side hold. For example, an employer negotiating wage increases with a union, if the employer threats to close the factory and the other party tells him/her to go on and close it, what will be the result. This type of negotiating tactic can result in huge problems.
Answer:
$53,000
Explanation:
Data given in the question
Beginning Accounts Receivable = $26,000
Credit Sales = $130,000
Collections of credit sales = $87,000
Write-offs = $16,000
So
As we know that
Ending Accounts Receivable = Beginning Accounts Receivable + Credit Sales - Collections of credit sales - Write-offs
= $26,000 + $130,000 - $87,000 - $16,000
= $53,000
