Answer:
I used the most recent figures of the international property rights index (year 2019), and the most recent GDP per capita estimamtes by the IMF in purchasing power parity. (year 2019)
Three countries with high scores, with GDP per capita (PPP):
- Finland - score of 8.712 - U$ 46.430
- Switzerland - score of 8.571 - U$ 64.649
- United States - score of 8.202 - U$ 62.606
Three countries with low scores, with GDP per capita (PPP):
- Ukraine - score of 4.432 - U$ 9.283
- Pakistan - score of 3.874 - U$ 5.680
- Haiti - score of 2.703 - U$ 1.864
The pattern that we find is that there is a strong correlation between the International Property Right Index scores and the GDP per capita figures. This is consistent with the findings in other similar rankings such as the Global Competitiveness Report, published by the World Economic Forum, and the Economic Freedom Index, published by the Heritage Foundation.
What can be interpreted is that property rights, and the strong enforcement of those property rights promote economic development and growth. This is because the protection of private property stimulates human action. For example, the United States has a strong judiciary, and rule of law. In this country, people can invest their money in a project with the certainty that those invesments will not be expropriated by an arbitrary judiciary. This promotes development because investing leads to higher economic output.
Those same incentives do not exist in countries that do not enforce property rights, and that is one of the main reasons why they are poor.
Answer:
Please see the answers below:
Explanation:
(O+) a. Increase in accounts payable
(F-) b. Payment of dividends
(O-) c. Decrease in accrued liabilities
(F+) d. Issuance of common stock
(O-) e. Gain on sale of building
(O+) f. Loss on sale of land
(O+) g. Depreciation expense
(O-) h. Increase in inventory
(O+) i. Decrease in accounts receivable
(I-) j. Purchase of equipment
Answer:
C, producer to agent to retailer
Explanation:
For a small manufacturer that cannot afford its own sales force, the best channel or chain of distribution is for the manufacturer to send his products to an agent then the agent sells the retailers.
The agent in this case has the sales force to distribute products which the manufacturer can't afford. This means that the manufacturer is most likely going to cut a deal with the agent as to how much will be remmited or how much the products would be sold to him and then he can pass it on to retailers for an added price.
All of these helps both the manufacturer, agent and retailer make profitsas well as ensure smooth and continuos distribution of products.
Cheers.
Answer:
A. The grocery department of a Walmart Supercenter or Target Superstore
Explanation:
- A profit center is a type of business where the business is expected to make into valuable contributions, a profit center can be treated as a separate business of the company.
- The profits and losses for that center are calculated separately. Examples of profit centers include the store, sales organization, or consulting organization.
Answer:
Cost per unit of widget produced = $6.52
Explanation:
As for the provided information:
Total units produced = 4,600 units
Total cost of production = costs for Department 1 + Department 2 + Department 3
= $18,000 + $8,000 + $4,000 = $30,000
It does not matter how many units are sold as the cost of sales will include, selling and administrative cost also.
Therefore, all the cost will be considered.
Thus total cost of production = $30,000 for 4,600 units.
Cost per unit of widget = 
