False. Evaluating interventions always involves measuring their impact on employee satisfaction, productivity, and the bottom line.
<h3>What is evaluating interventions?</h3>
A number of creative methods for conflict-resolution evaluation have been developed, despite the fact that conflict-resolution interventions are often evaluated on an as-needed basis.
1. Participants' Evaluation
Participatory evaluation is an evaluation strategy that is "bottom-up" or "people-centered."
2. Utilization-Focused Evaluation
In a utilization-focused evaluation, a group of "intended users" is identified who choose the "intended uses" for the evaluation data.
3. Impact Evaluation
The goal of an impact evaluation is to ascertain how effective an intervention is. Theoretically, this is straightforward, but the community involved in conflict resolution has not yet sufficiently defined the word "effect."
4. Action Evaluation
By encouraging stakeholders to define and track success, Action Evaluation seeks to assure the effectiveness of initiatives.
5. Macro-Evaluation
Macro-Evaluation, generally speaking, is to ascertain how grassroots micro-level initiatives 'ripple up' to the regional or national level.
To learn more about Evaluation of interventions visit:
brainly.com/question/28065744
#SPJ4
