Answer:
$ 714.957,6
Explanation:
<u>We should solve for the book value afer four years:</u>
3,800,000 x (0.2 + 0.32 + 19.2 + 11.52) =
3,800,000 x 0,8272 = 3.143.360
book value: 3,800,000 - 3,143,360 = 656.640
Now, we compare it against our expected sales value
745,000 - 656,640 = 88,360
This gain will be taxes at 34%
88,360 x 34% = 30.042,4
Now, the after tax salvage value will be :
745,000 - 30,042.4 = 714.957,6
Available Options are:
Fax machines
Printers
Smartphones
Video or audio conferencing machines
Answer:
All of the above except Printers
Explanation:
The reason is that printers are very important part of administration work so its more likely that we already have one. However it is possible that we don't have any fax machine, smartphones and video or audio conferencing machines as these are rarely used by the administration. So Printers will not be bought oor rented.
Answer:
Hersey's bond = $1125.513
Mars bond = $1172.259
Explanation:
Hersey bond;
Period(t) = 10years = 40(quartely)
Coupon (C) = $30
Rate (r) = 0.1 = 0.025(quarterly)
Pay at maturity(p) = $1000
Using the both present value (PV) and compound interest formula ;
PV =[ C × (1 - (1+r)^-t) ÷ r] + [p ÷ (1 + r)^t]
PV = [30×(1-(1.025)^-40)÷0.025] + [1000÷(1.025)^40]
PV =( 753.083251562) + (372.4306236)
PV = $1125.513
Mars bond;
Period(t) = 20years = 80(quartely)
Coupon (C) = $30
Rate (r) = 0.1 = 0.025(quarterly)
Pay at maturity(p) = $1000
PV =[ C × (1 - (1+r)^-t) ÷ r] + [p ÷ (1 + r)^t]
PV = [30×(1-(1.025)^-80)÷0.025] + [1000÷(1.025)^80]
PV =(1033.55451663) + (138.704569467)
PV = $1172.259
Answer:
The optimistic approach examines the best possible outcome in a given situation and chooses the 'best of the best' while the pessimistic approach examines the worst possible outcome in a given situation and chooses the 'best of the worst'.
Explanation:
Decision making under assumed uncertainty is an approach that is taken when the outcomes of future events are not entirely known. The Hurwicz criterion provides a basis on which the pessimistic and optimistic outcomes can be balanced. This criterion allows the person who makes the decision to chose a coefficient of pessimism signified by alpha (α) and it is a decimal that is graded between 0 and 1. This number signifies the worst possible outcome whereas, the number (1-α) signifies the best outcome.
So, the optimistic approach examines the best possible outcome in a given situation and allows the decision-maker to choose the 'best of the best', while the pessimistic approach examines the worst possible outcome in a given situation and the decision-maker to choose the 'best of the worst'
