Answer:
A) Lanni takes out a bank loan. It receives $50,000 in cash and signs a note promising to pay back the loan over three years. FINANCIAL ASSET CREATED: when the loan was received, a financial asset was created. Money is exchanged for a promissory note.
B) Lanni uses the cash from the bank plus $20,000 of its own funds to finance the development of new financial planning software. REAL ASSET CREATED: when the software was developed, a real asset was created. Money was invested in developing the software.
C) Lanni sells the software product to Microsoft, which will market it to the public under the Microsoft name. Lanni accepts payment in the form of 1,500 shares of Microsoft stock. FINANCIAL ASSET CREATED: when the software was traded, a financial asset was created. A real asset was traded in exchange for financial assets.
D) Lanni sells the shares of stock for $80 per share and uses part of the proceeds to pay off the bank loan." FINANCIAL ASSET DESTROYED: when the loan is paid back, the financial asset (loan) ceases to exist. When the money is paid back to the bank, the loan and the promissory note cease to exist.
Answer:
<em>False</em>
Explanation:
I jus got it right on the assignment.
Of the options given, the most likely member of a utilitarian organization is<u> a. </u><u>Angela</u><u>, who works as a </u><u>lawyer </u><u>at a </u><u>prestigious law firm </u><u>and </u><u>earns $60,000 annually.</u>
A utilitarian organization is one where:
- Employees receive some sort of compensation for their work
- Employees are usually contracted to a company to provide a certain service
Angela is receiving a compensation of $60,000 annually and is a lawyer which means that they are probably contracted to the law firm.
We can therefore conclude that Angela is working for a utilitarian organization based on the fact that there is compensation and contract.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/13956837. </em>
Answer: False
Explanation:
When the government subsidies production of a good, it leads to a rise in the supply of the good. The supply curve shifts down to the right leading to a <em>fall in the price level</em>. But the <em>equilibrium quantity increases</em>.
Thus, the given statement is false that if the government decides to subsidize the production of a good, the result would be a decrease in the equilibrium price and a decrease in the equilibrium quantity.