Answer:
The correct answer are: peripheral route; you do not have strong arguments for why your product is superior
Explanation:
The peripheral route, instead of examining the relevant arguments for the matter, individuals examine the message quickly or focus on simple indicators that help them decide whether to accept or reject the position advocated in the message. The elements that are peripheral to the arguments of the message are those that take center stage. These may include the communicator's physical attractiveness, the direct style of speaking, or the pleasant association between the message and the music that is heard in the background. Sometimes, the strength of the arguments is of secondary or almost null importance. Sometimes we lack the motivation, ability or time to reflect carefully. If we are disinterested, distracted or busy, we may not take the time to analyze the content of the message. Instead of analyzing whether the arguments are convincing, we will most likely follow the peripheral route, focusing on clues and indicators that activate automatic acceptance without too much cognitive processing. Peripheral processing allows communicators to design simple claims and messages to influence individuals. Although on many occasions this route may seem like the panacea of contemporary persuasion, the truth is that a good part of it is also carried out through mechanisms that involve careful and reflective considerations of the message's arguments, since, as we have indicated, When people have some motivation or are able to process messages, they are not based exclusively on peripheral cues and signals, or necessarily fall into the tricks of the persuader. When processing peripherally, people always rely on simple rules, to make decisions, "heuristic." For example the "heuristic" that experts should be believed and only for this reason accept the recommendation of a speaker, the heuristic "if many people think that something is good, then it should be" or those of reputation, consistency and security apparent in the argument. Peripheral and superficial processing does not produce profound and lasting changes of opinion. The effects of surface processing are ephemeral but relevant enough to convince an undecided voter or push a consumer towards the purchase of one or another product.
Answer:
22%
Explanation:
Net income = Annual cash flow - Depreciation
Net income = 24350 - (80,000-5,000 / 5)
Net income = 24350 - 15,000
Net income = $9350
Average investment = Beg. value + End. Value / 2
Average investment = 80,000 + 5,000 / 2
Average investment = $42,500
Annual rate of return = Net income / Average investment * 100
Annual rate of return = $9350 / $42,500 * 100
Annual rate of return = 0.22 * 100
Annual rate of return = 22%
An alternative plot for Amila to use is to use a graph to depict the data.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
From the information, she is worried that it is difficult to compare the distributions of two stocks that are not next to each other on the plot.
Therefore, a graph can be used to better illustrate the information.
Learn more about graph on:
brainly.com/question/19040584
#SPJ1
I believe that the correct answer is b project manager<span />
Answer:
$3,168
Explanation:
We will receive $4000 in future (after 4 years time) which means all we want to know is the amount that we Derek must deposit today.
This present value of the $4000 payment received after 4 years from today can be calculated using the following formula:
Present value = Future Value / (1 + r)^n
Here
Future Value is $4000
r is 6%
n is 4 years
So by putting values, we have:
Present value = $4000 / (1 + 6%)^4 Years
Present value = $3,168
