Structuralism
<span>An anthropological theory that people make sense of their worlds through binary oppositions like hot-cold, culture- nature, male-female, and raw-cooked. These binary oppositions are expressed in social institutions and cultural practices</span>
Answer:
Efficacy versus effectiveness
Explanation:
Efficacy versus effectiveness are both the same term but are different to some extent. Both terms are used to describe and get the result of the research. But we can describe effectiveness and efficacy in the medical condition in a different context. Effectiveness in the medical condition is getting the result in the natural wold environment without any controlled condition. Whereas the efficacy is reverse from effectiveness as the efficacy is the result under the controlled condition. The efficacy described how the medicine is used in controlled or ideal conditions whereas the effectiveness described how the medicine works in an average clinical setting or the natural world environment.
Answer:
A floating voter is a person who is not a firm supporter of any political party, and whose vote in an election is difficult to predict.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is A. The impact of literacy tests and poll taxes in Georgia was that they kept blacks and poor whites from voting.
Explanation:
The poll tax required before voting in Georgia had the consequence of restricting the right of suffrage of less wealthy people. This, added to the literacy tests, that granted the right to vote only to those who approved it, restricted the vote mainly of the African-American population, poor and generally without education.
Answer: when your depret to get points cuz your account got delted
Explanation: On April 22, 1793, President George Washington issued a Neutrality Proclamation to define the policy of the United States in response to the spreading war in Europe. “The duty and interest of the United States require,” the Proclamation stated, “that they [the United States] should with sincerity and good faith adopt and pursue a conduct friendly and impartial toward the belligerent Powers.” The Proclamation warned Americans that the federal government would prosecute any violations of this policy by its citizens, and would not protect them should they be tried by a belligerent nation. This statement of policy triggered a fierce reaction from those who considered it a sellout of the nation’s revolutionary soul for the financial gain of the merchant class. “The cause of France is the cause of man, and neutrality is desertion,” one anonymous correspondent wrote the president. Critics believed that the Proclamation marked a dishonorable betrayal of our oldest and dearest ally and to a sacred alliance made in the darkest hours of the American Revolution. The Proclamation was important for the constitutional precedent it established in the exertion of executive authority in the realm of foreign policy, as well as for exciting partisan passions that were formative to the creation of political parties in the first party system.
Several important recent developments in both American and Europe led to Washington’s Neutrality Proclamation. The French Revolution turned more radical when it beheaded King Louis XVI in January 1793. Ten days later, revolutionary France, already fighting Austria and Prussia, declared war on England, Holland, and Spain, embroiling the entire European continent in conflict. Lastly, on April 8, 1793 the new French minister, Edmond Genet, arrived in Charleston, South Carolina. Genet was an instant hit with the American people who flocked in large numbers to greet the ebullient Frenchmen as he made his way north to the capital in Philadelphia. More ominous, however, was the fact that Genet, armed with commissions and letters of marque from his government, actively recruited Americans to fight for revolutionary France.
